The Corner

Don’t Forget the Homemakers

Jillian Kay Melchior notes that after the fiscal-cliff deal, married couples will be paying the top tax rate when they make more than $450,000 but singles will be taxed at that rate when they make more than $400,000. So the second earner of a couple pays a higher rate than she (and it usually is a she) would pay if filing as an individual. Tax policy has created a new marriage penalty, Melchior writes, that hits high-earning married women and discourages them from working.

That’s the conventional analysis of the marriage penalty, but it has too narrow a focus. It makes more sense, I think, to view the marriage penalty instead as the cost to couples of the tax code’s failure to recognize marriage as the economic partnership that it (in part) is. On this view, couples that make $500,000 a year should be taxed the same regardless of how the income is distributed among members of the household. So a married couple in which one spouse makes $500,000 and the other makes $0 should be taxed at the same rate as a married couple in which each spouse makes $250,000, or one in which one spouse makes $400,000 and the other makes $100,000.

In other words, the marriage penalty doesn’t just fall on the latter two couples, since they pay higher taxes than if they were single. It falls on all three couples, including the one with a homemaker, since all of them pay more than two singles making $250,000 each. Just as some women who work in the paid labor force pay a marriage penalty, so do some women who stay home to raise kids. In both cases, their families pay the penalty too: This isn’t a tax that falls exclusively on women.

Both problems are pretty easy to solve conceptually. Just set the tax-bracket thresholds for married couples at twice the level of those for singles.

P.S. Yes, I know we’re talking here about a small number of people whose taxes probably don’t affect their economic circumstances so much as to affect marriage decisions, but I dislike this type of differential taxation on principle.

P.P.S. Taken together, tax and entitlement policies probably redistribute income away from one-earner couples to two-earner couples because the former tend to raise more kids, and raising kids is an overtaxed activity.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More