The Corner

Estrada Meets With Senate Republicans

Attorney Miguel Estrada will speak to Senate Republicans during their weekly lunch meeting Tuesday, a source tells National Review Online

Estrada represented Senate Republicans in their successful legal challenge against President Obama’s 2012 recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in January of this year against the Obama administration, arguing that the president’s appointment of three members to the NLRB was an unconstitutional abuse of executive power. Obama’s attempt to define “recess,” the court ruled, “would demolish the checks and balances inherent in the advice-and-consent requirement, giving the President free rein to appoint his desired nominees at any time he pleases.” 

The court’s ruling, minority leader Mitch McConnell has argued, also cast “serious doubt” on the constitutionality of Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Needless to say, it was an embarrassing blow to the president, and an inauspicious start to his second term.

For Estrada, who plans to update GOP senators about the status and implications of the ongoing legal challenge, the victory was especially sweet. A former assistant to the solicitor general, Estrada was nominated by George W. Bush in 2001 to serve on the D.C. Circuit Court. However, Democrats filibustered his nomination for more than two years, until Estrada ultimately withdrew from consideration in September 2003.

In 2004, leaked documents revealed the utterly cynical motives behind Democrats’ and liberal activists’ efforts to thwart Estrada’s nomination. A November 2011 staff memo sent to Senator Dick Durbin (D., Ill.) described Estrada as politically “dangerous” because he “has a minimal paper trail, he is Latino and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment.” Democrats could not abide a Republican president nominating the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice.

It’s worth keeping in mind, at least, when Democrats complain about how unfair and “unprecedented” it would be (hint: it wouldn’t) if Republicans decide to filibuster the nomination of Chuck Hagel for secretary of defense. 

Andrew Stiles — Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online. He previously worked at the Washington Free Beacon, and was an intern at The Hill newspaper. Stiles is a 2009 ...

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More