The Corner

The Fleecing of Religious Liberty

Mary Ann Glendon of Harvard (and former ambassador to the Holy See), John Garvey, president of Catholic University, and Robert P. George of Princeton, and Carter Snead, among others, are with Yuval, too

 Today the Obama administration has offered what it has styled as an “accommodation” for religious institutions in the dispute over the HHS mandate for coverage (without cost sharing) of abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. The administration will now require that all insurance plans cover (“cost free”) these same products and services.  Once a religiously-affiliated (or believing individual) employer purchases insurance (as it must, by law), the insurance company will then contact the insured employees to advise them that the terms of the policy include coverage for these objectionable things.

This so-called “accommodation” changes nothing of moral substance and fails to remove the assault on religious liberty and the rights of conscience which gave rise to the controversy.  It is certainly no compromise.  The reason for the original bipartisan uproar was the administration’s insistence that religious employers, be they institutions or individuals, provide insurance that covered services they regard as gravely immoral and unjust.  Under the new rule, the government still coerces religious institutions and individuals to purchase insurance policies that include the very same services.

It is no answer to respond that the religious employers are not “paying” for this aspect of the insurance coverage.  For one thing, it is unrealistic to suggest that insurance companies will not pass the costs of these additional services on to the purchasers.  More importantly, abortion-drugs, sterilizations, and contraceptives are a necessary feature of the policy purchased by the religious institution or believing individual.  They will only be made available to those who are insured under such policy, by virtue of the terms of the policy.

It is morally obtuse for the administration to suggest (as it does) that this is a meaningful accommodation of religious liberty because the insurance company will be the one to inform the employee that she is entitled to the embryo-destroying “five day after pill” pursuant to the insurance contract purchased by the religious employer.  It does not matter who explains the terms of the policy purchased by the religiously affiliated or observant employer.  What matters is what services the policy covers.

The simple fact is that the Obama administration is compelling religious people and institutions who are employers to purchase a health insurance contract that provides abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization.  This is a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand.  It is an insult to the intelligence of Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox Christians, Jews, Muslims, and other people of faith and conscience to imagine that they will accept as assault on their religious liberty if only it is covered up by a cheap accounting trick.

Finally, it bears noting that by sustaining the original narrow exemptions for churches, auxiliaries, and religious orders, the administration has effectively admitted that the new policy (like the old one) amounts to a grave infringement on religious liberty.  The administration still fails to understand that institutions that employ and serve others of different or no faith are still engaged in a religious mission and, as such, enjoy the protections of the First Amendment.

#more#

 Signed:

John Garvey

President, The Catholic University of America

 

Mary Ann Glendon

Learned Hand Professor of Law, Harvard University

 

Robert P. George

McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University

 

O. Carter Snead

Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame

 

Yuval Levin

Hertog Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center

_______________________________________________

 

Jean Bethke Elshtain

Laura Spelman Rockefeller Professor of Social and Political Ethics in the Divinity School, Department of Political Science and the Committee on International Relations, The University of Chicago

 

Tom Farr

Director of Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, Georgetown University

 

Richard W. Garnett

Associate Dean and Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame

 

Patrick MacKinley Brennan

John F. Scarpa Chair in Catholic Legal Studies and Professor of Law, Villanova University

 

Gerard V. Bradley

Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame

 

 

Paolo Carozza

Professor of Law and Director, Center for Civil and Human Rights, University of Notre Dame

 

George Weigel

Distinguished Senior Fellow and William E. Simon Chair in Catholic Studies, Ethics and Public Policy Center

 

Gilbert Meilaender

Duesenberg Professor in Christian Ethics, Valparaiso University

 

President Timothy O’Donnell

ChristendomCollege

 

Dr. William K. Thierfelder

President, Belmont Abbey College

 

Steven Smith

Class of 1975 Endowed Professor of Law, San Diego University

 

Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley

Professor of Law and Director, ADR & Conflict Resolution Program, Fordham University        

 

Michael Stokes Paulsen

Distinguished University Chair & Professor of Law The University of St. Thomas

 

Prof. Alan Mittleman

Professor of Modern Jewish Thought

The Jewish Theological Seminary

Rabie Meir Y. Soloveichik

Director, Straus Center for Torah and Western Thought, Yeshiva University

 

Micah J. Watson

Director, Center for Politics and Religion and Assistant Professor of Political Science, Union University

 

Helen Alvare

Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University

 

Michael Moreland,

Associate Professor of Law, Villanova University

 

V. Bradley Lewis

Associate Professor of Philosophy, The Catholic University of America

 

Matthew J. Franck

Director, William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution, the Witherspoon Institute

 

Kristina Arriaga

Executive Director, The Becket Fund

 

Christopher Tollefsen

Professor of Philosophy, University of South Carolina

 

Rusty Reno

Editor, First Things

 

Ryan Anderson

Editor, Public Discourse

 

Patrick Lee

Professor of Philosophy, Franciscan University of Steubenville

 

Francis J. Beckwith

Professor of Philosophy and Church-State Studies, Baylor University

 

William Imboden

Assistant Professor, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas

 

Patrick Fagan

Senior Fellow and Director, Marriage & Religion Research Institute

 

Gerald R. McDermott

Jordan-Trexler Professor of Religion, Roanoke Collegee

 

Austin Ruse

President, C-FAM

 

Ramesh Ponnuru

Senior Editor, National Review

 

Donna Bethell

Chairman of the Board, Christendom College

 

Father Jonathan Morris

Author, Televison Analyst

Basilica of St. Patrick’s Old Cathedral, NYC

Father Terence Henry

TOR President of Franciscan University of Steubenville

 

Marianne Evans Mount

President, Catholic Distance University

 

Robert D. Benne

Director of the Center for Religion and Society, Roanoke College

 

William Edmund Fahey

President, The Thomas More College of Liberal Arts (NH)

 

Michael Novak

George Frederick Jewett Scholar in Religion, Philosophy and Public Policy, American Enterprise Institute

 

Bernard F. O’Connor

President, DeSales Unviersity

 

Thomas S. Kidd

Associate Professor of History and Senior Fellow, Institute of Religion, Baylor University

 

Joseph Knippenberg

Professor of Politics, Oglethorpe University

 

Maggie Gallagher

Institute for Marriage and Public Policy

 

Robert C. Odle, Jr.

Partner, Weil Gotshal and Manges

 

Nancy Matthews

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More