The Corner

Fort Hood Shooter’s Defense: I Was Protecting the Taliban

At a hearing yesterday, Major Nidal Malik Hasan announced in court that he will use a “defense of others” argument to justify his actions. Hasan, who is charged with killing 13 and wounding 29 in a shooting at Texas’s Fort Hood in 2009, claims that he sought only to protect the lives of Taliban leaders, arguing that it was necessary for him to massacre the American soldiers in order to prevent Taliban members from being killed.

When asked specifically to name the people whom he was defending, he said “the leadership of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, the Taliban,” and specifically named founder Mullah Omar. The Department of Defense has classified the attack not as a terrorist act but as “workplace violence.”

Two days ago, Hasan was granted approval to defend himself in court, meaning that he will be allowed to directly address the judge and question witnesses — many of whom are victims of the shooting. But Hasan’s proposed defense suggests that the he may be using his right to self-representation as an opportunity to launch a radical Islamist, anti-American tirade in court, similar to the performance of convicted terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui, the 9/11 conspirator who denounced America as he received his sentence of life imprisonment.

The judge has delayed jury selection, giving Hasan a day to prepare a brief in his defense.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More