The Corner

Goldman’s Smack

David Goldman says I’m not listening to Ben Bernanke. Contrary to Bernanke’s predictions, he says, stocks have “tanked” and long-term interest rates have risen. Therefore QE2 has failed and I’m wrong to support it. The economists I’ve previously cited in support of QE2 are guilty of holding a “closed-economy model,” etc., as am I.

Almost none of this has anything to do with what I’ve said. As I wrote in my last post on this topic, I don’t agree with every argument that Bernanke has made for QE2. Specifically, I said that I have never expected it to reduce long-term interest rates. (I hope that long-term interest rates go up in response to the stronger recovery to which I think QE2 will contribute.) The goal is to address a monetary disequilibrium. Nominal GDP is still well below its pre-crisis trendline, and that’s something the Fed can and should rectify.

(Note to some readers: I am well aware of the arguments against having a Fed in the first place. I’m sympathetic to them! The Fed’s record is not particularly good–especially lately. It was too loose during the boom and then too tight in late 2008. As long as we have a Fed, though, I want its policies to be sensible; and I don’t think a loose policy is necessarily any more interventionist than a tight one. The fact of central banking is the key intervention, and it happened a long time ago.)

Incidentally, while I do not wish to speak for others, I am pretty sure that my second paragraph above accurately describes the views of Scott Sumner, David Beckworth, and Josh Hendrickson too. None of them were banking their support for QE2 on a reduction in long-term interest rates. None of them has a “closed economy model.” In fact, Sumner has placed a lot of emphasis on the European debt crisis as a contributor to the increased demand for dollars that has necessitated QE2.

Goldman’s critique may apply to a lot of people; just not the ones he has identified.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Two Truth-Tellers, Brave as Hell

Yesterday, the Human Rights Foundation hosted an event they called “PutinCon” -- a conference devoted to the Russian “president,” Vladimir Putin: his rise and his deeds, both at home and abroad. Participating were both Russians and well-wishing foreigners. It was, above all, a day of truth-telling -- a ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Swamp: Navarro Nucor Edition

The Wall Street Journal has a story today about the ties between President Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and the biggest steel company in the U.S. -- Nucor Corp. It is particularly interesting in light of the stiff steel tariffs successfully pushed by Navarro, which he championed ever since he joined the ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Samantha Power Regrets

‘I’ve had a lot of bad ideas in my life,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tells Politico. “Though none as immortalized as that one.” Wow. It’s a major concession. And what might “that one” be? Not standing idly by in the White House while Iranians protested a fixed election in 2009, then ... Read More