Guns and Externalities

Over on the homepage, Charlie Cooke has an excellent piece on the drive to force gun owners to pay for the externalities of gun ownership. A few months back mandatory gun insurance was all the rage; now it’s gun taxes.

Charlie makes the case based on principle, and I agree with him entirely: It is not kosher to tax people specifically for exercising a constitutional right, and the broader idea of using taxes and subsidies to account for every conceivable externality is a threat to liberty. Certainly, in some cases externalities should inform public policy — anyone who drives a car has a decent chance of causing expensive damage to someone else’s car, so it makes sense to require insurance; no one would want to repeal every penalty for pollution. But at some point it turns into farce. The government cannot account for every benefit and every harm caused by every behavior and then tax and subsidize accordingly.

The current proposals for gun taxes are especially ham-handed, because the question of gun externalities is especially thorny. In some cases, a gun enables someone to commit murder when they otherwise would not have. In other cases, a gun makes no difference — some people who kill with guns would otherwise kill with other tools. And in still other cases, the presence of a gun — or even the mere possibility of armed resistance — stops a crime from taking place. Before we can tax or subsidize based on these externalities, we have to calculate how they add up.

This is incredibly difficult to do; the world is a complicated place, and different ways of slicing the data (comparing various sets of countries, comparing states within the U.S., looking at trends within a given place, etc.) suggest different conclusions. Some researchers try to coax out trends that are not readily apparent, building complicated statistical models — but different researchers reach different results.

We can’t even say that guns cause more crime than they deter. And putting a price tag on the difference would be a whole new can of worms. How much is a life worth? Does it matter whose life? What about various injuries?

Gun-control supporters are presenting taxes as a simple way to internalize the externalities of gun ownership. They are far too confident in their assumptions.

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More