The Corner

Here Come the Greenhouse Regs

This afternoon, the U.S. EPA is scheduled to announce that it is making a formal endangerment finding for greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. This is the factual finding that triggers GHG regulation under various portions of the Act. No doubt, one reason for the announcement today is the administration’s desire to be seen as taking action on climate change during the Copenhagen summit.

Given the timing of the announcement, it’s pretty clear the EPA was not dissuaded in the least by the ClimateGate revelations. They had their minds made up. Does this matter legally? Probably not, but that depends on how the EPA defends its decision. Judicial review of the EPA’s decision will be quite deferential, as required by the Clean Air Act, so the EPA does not have to “prove” that its assessment is correct. Rather, all it needs to do is show that its decision was reasonable, given the scientific evidence available. So, as a practical matter, if EPA attorneys dotted their i’s and crossed their t’s (hardly a foregone conclusion given the Agency’s track record), the decision will withstand any legal assault, and the imposition of costly GHG regs will proceed apace. As a consequence, the only way to prevent regulation of GHGs under the Clean Air Act is to convince the EPA to change course (not gonna happen) or pass legislation denying the EPA such regulatory authority.

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More