The Corner

Here Is the Obama Administration’s Brief That Admits You Won’t Be Able To Keep Your Employer Health Plan Either

We’ve posted the video of my conversation with Megyn Kelly last night on The Kelly File at Fox News. We discussed the Obama administration brief that I mentioned in my last Obamacare column: the brief filed in federal court by Eric Holder’s Justice Department, on behalf of Kathleen Sebelius’s Department of Health and Human Services, in which the administration admits “that a majority of group health plans will have lost their grandfather status by the end of 2013.”

This admission is crucial for two reasons. First, Obamacare’s “grandfather” provision is what President Obama purported to rely on when he repeatedly promised, “If you like your health insurance plan, you can keep your health insurance plan, period.” Second, Obama has lately taken to claiming, falsely, that this broken promise only affects the comparatively small percentage of Americans who buy their own plans in the individual health insurance​ market. To the contrary, the administration’s assertions in the brief demonstrate: (a) the grandfather provision has always been illusory and was expected mostly to have faded away by the end of this year, meaning people who thought they could keep their plans under it would be “transitioned” into Obamacare exchanges by 2013; and (b) those losing the insurance plans Obama promised they could keep very much include Americans covered by “group health plans,” i.e., people who get employer-provided coverage, not just individual-market consumers. (Of course, the “transition” process has been slowed by the president’s “waiver” of the employer mandate, but it is already ongoing and will pick up pace in 2014 unless Obamacare is undone.)  

People have been asking where they can get the brief to read it for themselves. The brief has been posted by the American Freedom Law Center. It can be accessed here (and the relevant discussion begins at page 27).

As I mentioned in my column, I sit on the advisory board of the AFLC. It is representing Priests For Life, an organization that is suing Obama/Sebelius’s HHS over the Obamacare mandate that forces religious believers to provide coverage for abortifacients, contraceptives and related services. That is the case in which the government’s brief was submitted to federal court in Washington; thus, when the brief refers to the “defendants,” it is referring to the government itself — specifically, to HHS, the department that administers Obamacare.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More