The Corner

Politics & Policy

How Camp Clinton Plans to Shift the Blame for Any ‘October Surprise’

Here is a typical pro-Clinton inoculation spin against any “October surprise”, written in late July by Washington Post columnist David Ignatius while he was attending the Aspen Institute summer seminars:

“What worries U.S. officials most,” Ignatius wrote without citing any source, “is that given Russia’s willingness to use covert action against its adversaries, it might intervene before the November election. That might mean releasing embarrassing Clinton email . . . When she was secretary of state, she endorsed Russian dissenters.”

The reader is led to believe that Secretary Clinton, while publicly proclaiming a new era of cordiality — a “reset” — with Russia, was covertly opposing the regime. Russian officials uncovered her secret agenda. So they may retaliate by publicly releasing some of her missing e-mails. But why should that concern anyone? Didn’t she give us her word that the unreleased e-mails pertained to trivial matters like Yoga schedules?

Notice the clever head fake. Attention is shifted away from what may be contained in the e-mails. The issue now becomes the treachery of the Russians for violating the inamorata code of Clinton protectionism. Russia is the guilty party; it is employing “covert action.” This spin inoculates the public about the actual content in any e-mails that may be anonymously released in October. The intent is to obscure and excuse what Clinton concealed as secretary of state by blaming the Russians for disclosing anything from the treasure trove of the “missing” 60,000 e-mails.

The mainstream media has sided with the Clinton spinmeisters in order to discount any “October surprise.” The issue will not be the substance of the e-mails. Instead, there will be outrage that anyone had the temerity to disclose them. The last refuge of the scoundrel is patriotism.

On Monday, the FBI piled on, warning that state voting records may be compromised through Russian hacking. Oddly, the FBI did not circulate a similar warning before or after millions of federal security records were digitally stolen by the Chinese.

And notice how Monday’s Washington Post editorial handled the matter: “Election systems in at least two states have been compromised, seemingly by foreign hackers, possibly operating out of Russia. These revelations are only more worrying in light of the Russian government’s other apparent attempts to sway this year’s presidential election toward Mr. Trump . . . For the moment, the news does not suggest that foreign governments are rigging the election, or anything close.”

So the Post tells us: The Russians are rigging the election, though, at least so far, there is no evidence to prove that. (But watch out!)

Will there be an October leak of Clinton e-mails the FBI was unable to find? Who knows? But if there is, the real scandal should be the enormity of the information gained by a hostile government and the gross negligence of the secretary of state.

Bing West — Bing West, a bestselling author and former assistant secretary of defense, served as a Marine grunt in Vietnam and later as a dean at the Naval War College. A graduate ...

Most Popular


Two Truth-Tellers, Brave as Hell

Yesterday, the Human Rights Foundation hosted an event they called “PutinCon” -- a conference devoted to the Russian “president,” Vladimir Putin: his rise and his deeds, both at home and abroad. Participating were both Russians and well-wishing foreigners. It was, above all, a day of truth-telling -- a ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Swamp: Navarro Nucor Edition

The Wall Street Journal has a story today about the ties between President Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and the biggest steel company in the U.S. -- Nucor Corp. It is particularly interesting in light of the stiff steel tariffs successfully pushed by Navarro, which he championed ever since he joined the ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Samantha Power Regrets

‘I’ve had a lot of bad ideas in my life,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tells Politico. “Though none as immortalized as that one.” Wow. It’s a major concession. And what might “that one” be? Not standing idly by in the White House while Iranians protested a fixed election in 2009, then ... Read More