The Corner

How Not to Replace the Sequester

As you probably know, the deal to raise the debt ceiling in 2011 included cuts to planned spending that are supposed to begin this year: the sequester. A number of Republicans concerned about the impact of the sequester on the defense budget have proposed stopping the first year of cuts and instead saving the same amount of money by reducing the federal workforce over the next ten years. Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R., N.H.) and House Armed Services Committee chairman Buck McKeon (R., Calif.) are leading the charge.

When I first heard about this idea, it sounded like a good one to me. I’m in favor of cutting federal spending. Neither the workforce reductions nor across-the-board cuts seem like the wisest way to go about it. The sequester cuts seemed like a worse idea, though, because of the across-the-board cuts to defense. (I am very open to the possibility that a more deliberate plan for defense cuts would make sense.)

I spoke to a Republican senator the other day, though, and he changed my mind. He argued that this proposal would end up making the sequester the equivalent of Medicare’s “sustainable growth rate”: a spending cap that Congress constantly waives. Congress would have replaced a year of definite spending cuts with a promise of cuts over a decade, with most of the savings coming in the later years when the cuts would be least likely to materialize.

He argues that instead the Department of Defense, and maybe domestic agencies as well, should be given latitude to cut spending where they think best for the next year and that Congress should budget to hit the targets after that. (Budgeting: Now there’s an idea.) Or if the Democrats agreed, Congress could cut entitlements, starting now, to soften the across-the-board cuts.

His main point is that the spending cuts should go forward. During the fiscal-cliff debate, he points out, Obama had the prospect of automatic tax increases going for him. This time, Republicans have automatic spending cuts on the way. They shouldn’t give up a policy victory, even if an imperfect one; instead they should work to make it a bigger victory.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More