Politics & Policy

The Corner

Three Cheers for Fussy Over-Precision On Climate Change ‘Causing’ Hurricane Harvey

David Leonhardt of the New York Times had a piece the other day in which he warned against “fussy over-precision” in the debate over climate change and extreme weather events, by which he really means, simply, precision. The actual research on climate and extreme weather is always much too speculative and cautious for the advocates and journalists, so they have to, at best, simplify and exaggerate.

Consider this recent study on global warming and hurricanes by NOAA. It is guilty of fussy over-precision up and down. Who can take this instance of excessive precision pointing out that some effects of global warming might dissipate hurricanes?

Turning to future climate projections, current climate models suggest that tropical Atlantic SSTs [sea surface temperatures] will warm dramatically during the 21st century, and that upper tropospheric temperatures will warm even more than SSTs. Furthermore, most of the models project increasing levels of vertical wind shear over parts of the western tropical Atlantic (see Vecchi and Soden 2007). Both the increased warming of the upper troposphere relative to the surface and the increased vertical wind shear are detrimental factors for hurricane development and intensification, while warmer SSTs favor development and intensitification.

Or this shamefully precise estimate of what might happen 80 years from now?

Our updated late 21st century projections of hurricane activity continue to support the notion of increased intensity (~ 4%) and near-storm rainfall rates (~ 10 to 15%) for the Atlantic basin Knutson et al. 2013  as well as for most other tropical cyclone basins Knutson et al. 2015

Or this categorical statement of over-precision about how hurricanes haven’t increased?

However, when adjusted with an estimate of storms that stayed at sea and were likely “missed” in the pre-satellite era, there is no significant increase in Atlantic hurricanes since the late 1800s (red curve). While there have been increases in U.S. landfalling hurricanes and basin-wide hurricane counts since the since the early 1970s, Figure 4 shows that these increases are not representative of the behavior seen in the century long records. In short, the historical Atlantic hurricane record does not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced long-term increase.

It is reasonable to believe that warming may have made Harvey more intense or created more rainfall by some small, undetectable amount, but it’s an absurd and completely unsupportable leap to say that it was “caused” by global warming. Destructive and powerful hurricanes existed long before industrial-strength carbon emissions, and a large part of what happened with Harvey is that the storm stalled out, in a case of rotten luck. But there’s a reason the Left has to consider precision an enemy in the debate over the climate and extreme weather. The more precise the debate is, the more clear it is that the Left wants to curtail our economy today in the hopes of effecting an extremely marginal projected change in the global temperature 80 years from now and in the further hope of perhaps effecting an even more marginal change in what might be slightly more powerful cyclones in 2100. This obviously is not good or defensible public policy. So much the worse for precision.

(h/t Wall Street Journal and Roger Pielke)

Rich Lowry — Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. 

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More