The Corner

If Obama Takes Further Executive Action on Immigration, He Should Expect To Be Sued

Rumors abound that President Obama is soon to issue an executive order granting millions of illegal aliens some kind of legal status in the country and creating a permit system that would allow them to work. Current federal immigration law requires the deportation of these aliens and creates no work permit program. Most people admit that Congress has delegated no authority to the president to create classes of legal and illegal aliens — that is Congress’s job, which it has carried out by statute. I think the order is unconstitutional, but unlike previous examples of Obama’s failure to enforce the laws, is open to challenge in court.

The president has the constitutional obligation to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” (Article II, Section 3). That includes the discretion to allocate enforcement resources to best execute federal law, because the government does not have the power to enforce all laws all the time in all cases. Presidents can and should choose to throw the FBI and federal prosecutors, for example, at the highest-profile criminals who cause the most harm to society. But prosecutorial discretion does not include the power to refuse to enforce an entire law’s application to millions of cases because of simple disagreement with the policy of the law. The only time that the president can refuse to enforce a law is if the law itself is unconstitutional (as when President Jefferson refused to enforce the Sedition Act, which made criticism of the government a crime). Here, the president is refusing to enforce a law not because it is unconstitutional, but because he wants Congress to change its definition of illegal aliens and the circumstances for deportation. But it will be difficult, if not impossible, to challenge President Obama’s possible immigration order because the courts have generally refused to entertain lawsuits that seek to force the executive branch to prosecute defendants if it does not wish to.

But if President Obama seeks to issue an executive order that allows illegal immigrants to work in the United States with a permit, he will come into more direct conflict with Congress in an area — immigration — where the Constitution has long been understood to grant exclusive authority to the legislature. Federal immigration law imposes sanctions on employers who hire unauthorized aliens as workers. Private firms that hire illegal aliens will be exposing themselves to future prosecution, even if for now President Obama promises not to pursue them. These firms may have trouble doing business — operating in violation of federal law may cause problems for raising money, getting loans, and dealing with other elements of the legal system. Would a bank issue a loan to a construction company that is in violation of safety laws and codes, even if the company says that it’s been promised those codes won’t be enforced against them by the local inspector? A work-permit order could also expose the whole scheme to challenge in the federal courts, as a plaintiff who is not hired in favor of an illegal alien with an Obama work permit would have the right to sue.

For those interested in a fuller legal discussion of the issue, see my article in Texas Law Review, available for free download here.

John Yoo — John Yoo is the Emanuel Heller professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley and a Visiting Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. His latest book, Point of ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Political Clans Choose Public Life

Announcing that she has filed for divorce from her husband, Donald Trump Jr., Vanessa Trump wrote: “We ask for your privacy at this time.” That isn’t quite what she meant — apparently, nobody in the Trump family ever will speak English as fluently as Melania — but the sentiment was predictable enough. ... Read More


Happy Saint Patrick’s Day, everyone. Hope it has been a good one. Yesterday, I had a tale in my Impromptus column. I had been to Harvard, to conduct a couple of interviews, and I waxed nostalgic. In Widener Library, there are bag-checkers -- people checking your bags on your way out. Ages ago, there was this ... Read More

Two Truth-Tellers, Brave as Hell

Yesterday, the Human Rights Foundation hosted an event they called “PutinCon” -- a conference devoted to the Russian “president,” Vladimir Putin: his rise and his deeds, both at home and abroad. Participating were both Russians and well-wishing foreigners. It was, above all, a day of truth-telling -- a ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Samantha Power Regrets

‘I’ve had a lot of bad ideas in my life,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tells Politico. “Though none as immortalized as that one.” Wow. It’s a major concession. And what might “that one” be? Not standing idly by in the White House while Iranians protested a fixed election in 2009, then ... Read More