Politics & Policy

The Corner

If You’re Explaining, You Los- Eh, No, Wait, You’re Doing Your Job.

I’ve always disliked the oft-cited political axiom, “if you’re explaining, you’re losing.” It may generally be true, or be better rephrased that voters are more receptive to simple explanations than complicated ones. But when you hear someone in the political world citing it, they’re usually preemptively dismissing facts contrary to a false or dubious assertion.

At it’s heart, “if you’re explaining, you’re losing” is a statement opposing explanations. It implies the electorate doesn’t have the attention span to hear the explanation, isn’t capable of understanding it, or is so reflexively suspicious that it will reject any explanation as a lie.

If you genuinely believe this, then it follows that you think the collective voting electorate has a set amount of knowledge bout a topic, and will not receive or be able to process or contemplate any additional information. But if this was the case, polls would never move. Judging from the polls, Republican primary voters began this cycle open to the idea of Jeb Bush, and decided against it after watching him campaign. They were initially not that familiar with Ben Carson, initially impressed and warmed to him, and then turned away as summer turned into fall. Voters are almost always taking in new data – usually a little, sometimes more as the race gets more coverage and events like debates and primaries occur. So explanations can’t be inherently pointless or self-defeating.

It came up this morning in the context of Donald Trump’s claim that Colorado’s delegates to the convention are rightfully his, and some nefarious group conspired to take them away from him and give them to Ted Cruz. (You notice how rarely anyone ever mentions that eight Trump delegates were selected as alternates. Something like that would complicate the simple conspiracy-theory story.)

Even if the axiom “if you’re explaining, you’re losing” applies to political campaigns, it should be printed out and set on fire in every newsroom and office of anyone connected to the journalism business. Earlier this week, Howard Kurtz offered a curious new standard: If a caucus system is complicated, and if party procedures are “arcane”, then it “starts to look pretty ugly and pretty undemocratic.” Well, gee whiz, the party procedures are only “arcane” if nobody bothers to tell the public about it after reading them on the state party’s web site. Explaining something like the Colorado Republican Party’s rules for selecting delegates to the public sounds an awful lot like the job of political journalists, doesn’t it?

Here it is in three steps: You vote for delegates at your precinct March 1; the delegates you elect vote among themselves for delegates to district and statewide conventions; at the district and statewide conventions, those delegates vote on who goes to Cleveland. Boom. Done. Republicans can argue about whether that’s the best system, or even a good system. But everyone arguing about it ought to know how it works.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More