The Corner

Infrastructure Spending Will Employ Few Unemployed Workers

President Obama has an answer to our sluggish economy: more infrastructure spending. He proposes creating jobs by spending billions more on infrastructure. Sadly this idea only illustrates H. L. Mencken’s point that “for every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”

As I explain in a new paper, even on Keynesian terms such spending would create few new jobs. Infrastructure projects are capital intensive—not labor intensive. A relatively small number of workers use advanced equipment to build our highways and roads. The entire highway, street, and bridge construction sector employs just 300,000 workers. That’s less than the population of Wichita, Kan. Machines, not men, do most of the brute work.

Moreover, those men (and women) are highly skilled. An unemployed residential electrician cannot simply start work building a highway overpass. It takes several years of training to learn how to operate construction machinery. Few of the currently unemployed have this training. Most of the fall in construction employment in the recession occurred in housing construction, not infrastructure. Just 1 in 200 unemployed workers previously worked as construction-equipment operators.

Consequently, most skilled workers hired on new infrastructure projects would come from other jobs (as happened with the stimulus). Additional spending would reshuffle who works where while creating few new jobs for the unemployed.

America does not need to increase infrastructure spending. Our roads have fewer potholes now than at any point in the past two decades. Of course the government should fix bridges and interstates in disrepair. But thinking this will reduce unemployment is simply wrong. 

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More