The Corner

It Really Is about Soaking the Rich

The drive to raise taxes this year really is just about soaking the rich. Liberals just can’t decide who is really rich.

Raising taxes on those making more than $200,000 (or $250, 000 if married) has been dressed up as fiscal propriety, sound economic policy, or even “fairness.” I’ve disagreed at length (see here) in recent testimony before the Senate.

But as Democrats have negotiated with themselves, it has become increasingly clear that this is simply about figuring out who is rich enough to safely attack. The latest salvo came from Alice Rivlin, a member of the White House’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, who said in an interview that Congress should exempt everyone who makes less than $500,000 a year from a higher tax threshold. The key insight is that she felt that it was a way to “cut a deal” on the definition of “high income” because “there would be few people that believe $500,000 is not a lot of money.”

This comes on the heels of Sen. Blanche Lincoln arguing that the magic line should be drawn at $1 million.

My question is: Why should there be a line at all? Why are Democrats so intent on dividing America? When did it become received wisdom that there should be a class of families responsible for paying for the costs of government, and a privileged class that should reap only the benefits?

The reality of the situation is that payroll taxes are earmarked for specific Social Security and Medicare benefits. Income taxes pay the cost of general government, and close to one-half of Americans currently pay no income tax. Why should the cost of government be further targeted on a very few?

Douglas Holtz-Eakin is president of the American Action Forum.

Most Popular

National Security & Defense

Leave McMaster Be

About every two months, there are rumors that Gen. H. R. McMaster might be let go as Trump’s national-security adviser (along with many other stellar appointees). The world, however, is a much more logical and predictable place than it was 14 months ago. We’ve restored ties to the Gulf monarchies; Israel ... Read More
Economy & Business

What Kudlow Got Right in 2007

Lawrence Kudlow’s appointment to be director of the National Economic Council has brought out the critics, who have combed through his copious writings to find every wrong call he has made over the decades. One passage that has come in for some ridicule, though, doesn’t deserve it. Here’s Kudlow, writing ... Read More
Film & TV

Love, Simon Outs Hollywood’s Youth Exploitation

Simon (Nick Robinson), the 17-year-old white gay high-school student in Love, Simon, appears to be a comic version of the protagonist in Moonlight. Rather than blatantly copy that Oscar-winning black-gay-victim film, Love, Simon remakes the pathetic Moonlight in the more marketable guise of a sitcom about a ... Read More

Don’t Bork Gina Haspel

President Donald Trump’s pick for CIA director is about to experience a good Borking. No one doubts her professionalism, and she’s been endorsed by Obama intelligence officials. Yet Gina Haspel’s long career at the agency, including extensive work undercover in the field, is getting blotted out by her ... Read More

On the Virtues of Agreeing to Disagree

In the Washington Post, Chuck Lane makes a thoughtful case for reframing the aims of public discourse: “National unity may be beyond our reach; national cohesion is not.” To achieve this cohesion, Lane suggests that we should lower the stakes of contemporary political debates by trying to find compromise ... Read More