The Corner

Krauthammer’s Take

From Special Report with Bret BaierTuesday, September 4, 2012

On Senator Durbin’s reaction to questions about removing references to God and Jerusalem from the Democratic Party platform:

I was just surprised by how defensive he was and how he immediately went on the attack, particularly on the Jerusalem issue.

What happened with the change in the language of the platform is extremely significant. It may be true that we here don’t read platforms, but I can assure you that in the Middle East, where the entire diplomacy is conducted in very subtle coded language, they can read what the Democrats have done.

Four years ago they asserted that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel and should be. That is nowhere to be seen. That takes the rug away from the Israeli position.

Four years ago it said that in any final solution, any final settlement, Israel must remain undivided. By removing the language, that means that the United States, the Democratic Party, is prepared to see barbed wire go through Jerusalem as it did in the 20 years between the late 1940s and the 1967 war.

No mention, as four years ago, of isolating Hamas. That’s a change in position on terrorism.  No mention whatsoever of the platform stance four years ago that Israel is not to return to the ‘67 line.

These are all extremely important. And for Durbin to pretend that it’s not and to mention Harry Truman, who recognized Israel 65 years ago, I think shows how defensive and panicked they are on this one important issue.

Platforms don’t really tell you what’s going to happen. But when you compare today with what people used to believe and used to say and used to proclaim, and you see these glaring changes, you know that something has changed in the party.

This is one place where Obama led from in front and not from behind — moving the [Democratic] party, not just himself [regarding Israel]. 

NRO Staff — Members of the National Review Online editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More