The Corner

Lawmaker Excluded from CFPB Meeting, Unable to Hold Executive to Account

Representative Sean Duffy (R., Wis.) recently attempted to attend an advisory committee meeting of the Consumer Financial Protection Board. The agency declined to let him in, preventing him from holding this executive agency to account.

The CFPB has a track record of secrecy and excluding people. My colleague John Berlau wrote last year about how the CFPB Consumer Advisory Board excluded observers from a secret meeting that was about ensuring that it could see the full credit records of 80 percent of Americans.

If a lawmaker cannot hold the executive powers of the CFPB to account, who can? That’s why CEI, the 60 Plus Association, and a community bank, the State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, have brought a lawsuit against the CFPB and the Dodd-Frank Act that spawned it to have the court find its lack of oversight unconstitutional. We argue that:

‐Congress exercises no “power of the purse” over the CFPB, because the agency’s budget — administered essentially by one person — comes from the Federal Reserve, amounting to approximately $400 million that Congress cannot touch or regulate.

The president cannot carry out his constitutional obligation to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” because the president cannot remove the CFPB director except under limited circumstances.

Judicial review of the CFPB’s actions is limited, because Dodd-Frank requires the courts to give extra deference to the CFPB’s legal interpretations.

The Dodd-Frank Act gives an agency of unelected government bureaucrats unrestrained power. They argue this unaccountable power over the daily lives of the American people results in a lack of public accountability, creating a power grab over every U.S. citizen.

The CFPB has legislative, executive, and judicial functions with no oversight. The Founding Fathers would have regarded it as an abomination.

The unrestrained power of the CFPB should really bring us back to a philosophical discussion of the fundamental role of the various branches of government — a topic I’ve been discussing recently here, here, and (for the really interested) in an hour-long interview with Jonathan Emord last night, which you can download from the Wednesday March 19 link on the left here.


Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More