The Corner

Mark Bittman Should Stick to Cooking

 

Mark Bittman is known for cooking simple food and his opinion pieces in the New York Times follow a similar recipe for simplicity. In his Sunday piece, Bittman applies his “less is more” theory of cooking to obesity—taking out all the complexities of the condition and prescribing a blanket solution for all the world’s food troubles: tax it!

Bittman wants the government to “tax things like soda, French fries, doughnuts and hyperprocessed snacks” as a way for the government to begin “fulfilling its role as an agent of the public good and establishing a bold national fix.” He says taxing food is “fun” and inspiring.”

Yet, while Bittman might cite the standard foodie bad boys like doughnuts and French fries, the government sees what many of us would consider health food as deserving targets for onerous government regulations and who knows, why not taxes too.

Consider the actions of the Interagency Working Group (IWG) on Food Marketed to Children—a government task force made up of four powerful federal agencies–the Federal Trade Commission, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The IWG seeks to “guide the [food] industry in determining which foods would be appropriate and desirable to market to children to encourage a healthful diet and which foods industry should voluntarily refrain from marketing to children.”

Let’s take a look at what foods the IWG sees as a barrier to children developing a “healthful diet.”

·  All cereals

·  Pretzels, nuts, popcorn, snack bars, and crackers

·  Milk, yogurt, yogurt drinks, and cheese

·  Bread, rolls, bagels, breadsticks, and buns

·  Fruit and vegetable juices, tea drinks, and bottled water

·  Canned soups and pastas

·  Sherbet, sorbet, popsicles, and frozen yogurt

I’m sure most reasonable people would be shocked to see nuts, milk, yogurt, pretzels and bottled water on the list of foods about which the government is concerned. But there they are, listed in footnote number 17 on page 7 of the IWG report.

You know, up front and easy to find.

It is easy for Bittman to target big, bad sugary sodas and scary, awful fried and “hyperprocessed” snack foods even though there exists exactly zero evidence that taxing these foods helps to, in any way, shrink people’s waistlines (see the latest study from Northwestern University on why soda taxes don’t work), but Bittman seems oblivious to just how far the government wants to go in regulating what people eat. In fact, most of the ingredients in Bittman’s own food columns would be barred from food advertising.

Bittman means well and like so many people who see no harm in nudging people to eat better, they fail to see the real economic impact of their policy recommendations.  Food prices simply will rise if the government begins arbitrarily taxing foods it deems unhealthy.  To many Americans already struggling with the bottom line, this is yet another cost that must be absorbed.

Last year, Bittman wrote a sweet story about his mother’s preference to eat a (gasp!) frozen dinner in her room at the retirement home rather than the food offered in her home’s dining facility. When visiting, he said he opted for two frozen dinners as a way to hedge his bets by having two different kinds of meals.

While Bittman may enjoy the luxury of being able to afford two dinners, the rest of America will struggle to make ends meet as food prices soar.

 

Julie Gunlock is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More