# Math Fun with President Obama

With math skills like this, no wonder the federal deficit is \$1.3 trillion:

The Washington Examiner reports that at a fundraiser in Las Vegas, the president said the following about his jobs bill:

But last week, we had a separate vote on a part of the jobs bill that would put 400,000 teachers, firefighters and police officers back on the job, paid for by asking people who make more than \$1 million to pay one-half of 1 percent in additional taxes. For somebody making \$1.1 million a year, that’s an extra \$500. Five hundred bucks. And with that, we could have saved 400,000 jobs.

Most people making more than \$1 million, if you talk to them, they’ll say, I’m willing to pay \$500 extra to help the county. They’re patriots. They believe we’re all in this thing together. But all the Republicans in the Senate said no. (Emphasis added).

As every Corner reader who graduated from 4th grade determined immediately upon reading the above quote, one half of 1 percent of \$1.1 million is \$5,500, not \$500. But, hey, even though he said it three times, cut the president some slack — he’s off only by about factor of ten.

But even if the president meant to say \$5,500, his math continues to pose some challenges. According to the IRS, a total of 235,413 taxpayers earned more than \$1 million last year. If each “was willing to pay \$[5,]500 extra to help the country,” that would generate only \$1.3 billion in revenue — approximately what the federal government spends every three hours. Wouldn’t it be just as patriotic for President Obama to turn off the federal spigot for three hours and dedicate the savings to funding those 400,000 jobs?

The president at least deserves credit for finally bringing down the cost of all those jobs his administration “saves or creates.” Saving 400,000 jobs at a cost of \$1.3 billion comes to just \$3,250 per job — far less than the \$250,000 per each job allegedly created by the 2009 stimulus bill.

But wait, that means that each of the 400,000 jobs will only pay \$ 1.60 an hour — far below the lawful minimum wage. And that’s without benefits. Aren’t those the kind of  jobs Americans won’t do?

Even if the president were to politely “ask” all of those willing millionaire patriots to pay an extra one half of 1 percent of their total aggregate income for 2010, the added revenue would be only about \$3.6 billion. But that still comes to only around \$4.50 an hour, again without benefits. Not sure how many cops, firefighters, and teachers would be willing to work at that rate — even if the Department of Labor permitted it.

Maybe the president should just ask the 47 percent of American filers who pay no federal income taxes if they’re willing to pony up anything for those shovel-ready jobs. Surely the president doesn’t think millionaires are the only patriots in this country.

### Most Popular

#### The Russians Colluded Massively — with Democrats

Special counsel Robert Mueller and his investigators resemble axe-wielding firefighters frantically stomping through a house and not finding so much as a lit birthday candle. Meanwhile, the home next door burns to the basement. Team Mueller’s never-ending hunt for reds in October 2016 has found zero evidence ...

#### Is ‘Collusion with Russia’ Over?

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been a busy fellow for the past week. Rapid fire, his indictment of several Russian nationals for meddling in the 2016 election has been followed by a guilty plea, for lying to investigators, from a lawyer tied to Trump-campaign figures Paul Manafort and Richard Gates; a new ...

#### Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ...

#### Excusing Cowardice Is Not the Path to Gun Control

In the entire horrible history of modern mass shootings, have government failures ever been so comprehensive and so heartbreaking as those that led up to school massacre in Parkland, Fla.? The FBI received a precise tip and failed to act. Local law enforcement was called to the shooter’s home dozens of times. ...

#### My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ...

#### The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ...

#### An Epidemic of Dishonesty on the Right

First it was the Holocaust, now Parkland — is there any act of depravity to which the less respectable right-wing media cannot imagine a connection for George Soros? David Clarke, the sheriff of Fox News, insisted that the Florida students’ reaction to the shooting “has GEORGE SOROS’ FINGERPRINTS all ...

#### Assault Weapons Preserve the Purpose of the Second Amendment

Arguments about guns tend to suffer from two distinct problems. The first — and most obvious — is they quickly get screechy. The arguments devolve into shouting matches and temper tantrums. The goal isn’t to persuade but to mock and bully, as if stigma alone can decisively shift the public debate. The ...

#### Another Misfire at the New York Times

The New York Times is uniquely bad on the subject of firearms. There are two ways to understand that sentence, and both apply: Among major news publications, the Times regularly exhibits an unparalleled level of illiteracy on the subject of firearms, and it exhibits comparable illiteracy on practically no other ...

#### A Gun-Control Measure Conservatives Should Consider

To understand the American gun-control debate, you have to understand the fundamentally different starting positions of the two sides. Among conservatives, there is the broad belief that the right to own a weapon for self-defense is every bit as inherent and unalienable as the right to speak freely or practice ...