The Corner

The Media’s Know-Nothing-about-Romney Party

BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski does some great work dredging up statements by political figures, some entertaining, some revealing, some damning. But today he’s seized upon a couple clips as evidence of the false meme I addressed below, the idea that Romney’s abandoned the tax-cut proposal he had during the primaries. He writes:

Romney Contradicts Himself On Cutting Taxes Of The Wealthy From Earlier Debate

The Republican presidential nominee said he wouldn’t lower the share of the burden higher income people pay in taxes the debate Wednesday night. In a February Republican primary debate, Romney said would cut taxes for everybody “including the top one percent.”

First of all, it’s obviously quite possible to cut taxes for everyone, “including the top 1 percent,” and not reduce the share paid by high-income individuals; this is in no way a mathematical contradiction, since you could just cut poorer people’s taxes by more than you do richer people’s (indeed, the Bush cuts lowered everyone’s, and by moving millions off the tax rolls, made the system in some ways more progressive).

But this is a revealing point about how the media have ignored Romney’s actual plan in order to claim that last night he contradicted himself or walked back on his proposal’s main principles. In the first bit, from last night, he says, “I will not reduce the share [of taxes] paid by high-income individuals.” In the second clip, from a primary debate, Romney says, “we’re gonna cut taxes on everyone across the country by 20 percent, including the top 1 percent.”  

As I said above, it’s perfectly possible not to reduce the rich’s share, and reduce the amount everyone pays in taxes, as Kaczynski suggests he promises in the second clip — but that’s not at all what Romney says, or what he’s proposing, as members of the media should (and do) know. He’s explaining that he would lower the statutory marginal rates, not the amounts paid, for everyone, “including the top 1 percent.” That’s the core of his plan: lowering the 35 percent rate by seven points to 28, etc. This is clearly what he’s describing here, and the “20 percent” reference clues in anyone who’s bothering to pay attention and tell the truth, rather than fuel a false media narrative.

(It’s a fair question whether Romney will be able to eliminate enough deductions such that 20 percent marginal-rate cuts don’t decrease the share the wealthy pay — maintaining progressivity, cutting rates, and being deficit-neutral is really tough, and will require, say, getting rid of the muni-bond exemption despite a promise not to touch investment preferences. But Mitt is, as ever, not proposing a huge cut in taxes paid, but rather, a large cut in rates, which is where Kaczynski, and Obama last night, went wrong.)

Patrick Brennan — Patrick Brennan is a writer and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C. He was Director of Digital Content for Marco Rubio's presidential campaign, writing op-eds, policy content, and leading the ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Broward’s Cowards

It is impossible to imagine circumstances under which Broward County sheriff Scott Israel could attempt to perform his duties with the confidence of the public. He should resign immediately, and if, as he promises, he refuses to go quietly, then he should be shown the door by the people he professes to ... Read More

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

CNN’s Shameful Town Hall

CNN recently hosted an anti-gun town hall featuring a number of grieving children and parents from Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., who aimed their ire at the National Rifle Association, politicians peripherally associated with the NRA, and anyone who didn’t say exactly what they wanted to hear. ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More