The Corner

Medicare’s Dim Horizon

The Center for Public Integrity is publishing a series of articles this week on wasteful spending in the Medicare program. Politicians talk a big game about saving Medicare by eliminating wasteful spending, but they never follow through. That’s because, as the Center explains, much of the waste in Medicare results from the overuse of medical services and the prescription of unnecessary treatments — the essential byproducts, in other words, of a third-party, fee-for-service insurance system. Fixing the system is going to require a thorough rethinking of how best to provide this benefit to seniors and people with disabilities — and few politicians are up to the task.

The first installment in the series doesn’t break any new ground, but it does provide a clear, concise explication of how we got here and what our choices are going to be. It points out, in a fair-minded way, the shortcomings of the approaches to cost control taken by the authors of the recently passed Affordable Care Act. And it promises, in future installments, “a vivid picture of some of the questionable spending that occurs in the Medicare program.” Something to keep on your radar.

While we’re on the subject: A few weeks back, the editors noted both the desperation with which some liberals were distorting Republican proposals on entitlement spending and also the frivolity of the counter-proposals emanating from such personages as Charlie Crist, who, without offering specifics, made a cliché of himself by offering to save the system by cutting down on “waste and fraud.” The editors wrote:

It seems like just months ago (actually, it was) that Democrats were accusing Republicans of opportunistically trying to scare seniors by highlighting the $500 billion in Medicare cuts contained in the Obama-Reid-Pelosi health-care bill. Republican supporters of entitlement reform, in particular, were labeled hypocrites, and some even deserved it. But there is a big difference between making cuts to entitlement programs to ensure their long-term solvency and appropriating $500 billion from an already-bankrupt program to fund a new entitlement.

That’s true. But there’s another big difference, which John McCormack explains here: The $500 billion that the Democrats’ health-care bill would take from Medicare to fund new subsidies for able-bodied adults would come from benefit cuts affecting seniors today. By contrast, the kind of reforms that Republicans are putting on the table would be phased in so that current and near-retirees wouldn’t be affected. That’s an important political difference, but it’s an important moral difference, too: It speaks to the the need to give people time to adjust their long-term plans to the proposed policy changes. Those who possess clear sight with regard to the worsening state of Medicare are already making those adjustments, I hope.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More