The Corner

Michael Kinsley on the Mandate and the Constitution

Michael Kinsley argues in Bloomberg View 1) that striking down the mandate would call into question decades of commerce-clause jurisprudence, making even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 vulnerable and 2) that nobody argued the mandate was unconstitutional until after Obamacare passed.

As for the first argument: Well, maybe, but I suspect that any opinion striking down the mandate would be pretty careful to distinguish precedents. The legal briefs against the mandate are not generally asking for the last few decades of commerce-clause precedents to be overruled; they’re arguing that upholding the mandate would go beyond those precedents.

As for the second argument: The factual premise is false, although it is certainly true that the constitutionality of the law became more of an issue once the law was enacted. But leave that aside. If the argument that “nobody told us the law was unconstitutional at the time” has any bearing on the question of whether the law is unconstitutional, then what do we make of the many, many laws that the Supreme Court has struck down even though they were on the books for decades without anyone’s questioning their constitutionality? Most of the laws nullified by Roe v. Wade had been in place for decades, as had the laws invalidated by Lawrence v. Texas. As far as I know, nobody questioned the constitutionality of these laws for most of their existence.

(Kinsley, by the way, says “it is generally considered” that the Court was right in Lawrence, which also seems to me to be a false statement.)

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Economy & Business

The Swamp: Navarro Nucor Edition

The Wall Street Journal has a story today about the ties between President Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and the biggest steel company in the U.S. -- Nucor Corp. It is particularly interesting in light of the stiff steel tariffs successfully pushed by Navarro, which he championed ever since he joined the ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More

Nancy MacLean Won’t Quit

One of the biggest intellectual jousting matches last year was between Duke history professor Nancy MacLean, who wrote a slimy, dishonest book about Nobel Prize–winning economist James Buchanan and the whole limited-government movement, and the many scholars who blasted holes in it. If it had been a boxing ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More

How Germany Vets Its Refugees

At the height of the influx of refugees into Germany in 2015–17, there was little doubt that mixed among the worthy cases were economic migrants taking advantage of the chaos to seek their fortunes in Europe. Perhaps out of instinctive pro-immigrant sentiment, Germany’s Left obscured the difference. Its ... Read More