The Corner

Modern International Law V. English Common Law

Jonah, you’re correct that there is a major difference between the Court’s reliance on English common law tradition at the time of the adoption of our constitution in the late 1700s and the sort of importation of modern international legal trends that has become so popular with today’s Supreme Court. One of the more amusing, albeit distressing, opinions that conflates those two concepts was Justice Souter’s opinion last summer in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (and I’m not just mentioning that opinion because I was mentioned in fn. 21). At issue was whether the Alien Tort Statute (or Alien Tort Claims Act), a 1789 law that gave federal courts jurisdiction over any civil action by an alien for a tort committed in violation of the law of nations, would support a federal cause of action for the alleged false arrest of a DEA agent’s murderer in Mexico. After correctly reviewing the “law of nations” applicable in 1789 and concluding that private causes of action for such torts were extremely limited to a very narrow category of cases, such as piracy and the infringement of the rights of ambassadors, the Court went on to conclude that more modern equivalents might be allowable, too. But those modern claims, Souter concluded, must “rest on a norm of international character accepted by the civilized world and defined with a specificity comparable to the features of the 18th-century paradigms we have recognized.” As with last week’s Kennedy opinion, I’m still trying to figure out what that means. But it clearly leaves the door open for a much more expanded incorporation of modern international standards than the narrow category of cases recognized by the Court as applicable at the time of passage of the statute. This is simply an example, but the danger is even greater in the area of constitutional interpretation. At least with respect to the ATS, Congress could always change the Court’s prevailing interpretation with a simple majority vote of both Houses and the President’s signature. When the Court looks to modern international trends in interpreting the constitution, we have but two choices: Amend the constitution or amend the Court’s makeup. Because the latter is much easier than the former, the politicization of judicial nominations will only increase in the immediate term.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Broward’s Cowards

It is impossible to imagine circumstances under which Broward County sheriff Scott Israel could attempt to perform his duties with the confidence of the public. He should resign immediately, and if, as he promises, he refuses to go quietly, then he should be shown the door by the people he professes to ... Read More
Culture

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More
Immigration

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

CNN’s Shameful Town Hall

CNN recently hosted an anti-gun town hall featuring a number of grieving children and parents from Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., who aimed their ire at the National Rifle Association, politicians peripherally associated with the NRA, and anyone who didn’t say exactly what they wanted to hear. ... Read More
U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More