# More on the President’s Uninsured Tax

There has been, understandably, a lot of attention paid to the tax that uninsured Americans will have to pay if they decide not to buy insurance. I find this data useful to understand how it may work:

• The penalty/tax will be phased in from 2014 to 2016.

• The minimum penalty/tax in 2016 will be \$695 per person and up to 3-times that per family.

• After 2016, these amounts will increase at the rate of inflation.

• The minimum penalty/tax per person will start at \$95 in 2014 (and then increase through 2016)

• No family will ever pay more than 3X the per-person penalty, regardless of how many people are in the family.

• The \$695 per-person penalty is only for those who make between \$9,500 and ~\$37,000 per year. If you make less than ~\$9.500, you’re exempt. If you make more than ~\$37,000, your penalty is calculated by the following formula…

• The penalty is 2.5% of any household income above the level at which you are required to file a tax return. That level is currently \$9,500 per person and \$19,000 per couple. The penalty on any income above that is 2.5%. So the penalty can get expensive quickly if you make a lot of money.

• However, the penalty can never be more than the cost of a “Bronze” heath insurance plan purchased through one of the state “exchanges” that will be created as part of Obamacare. The CBO estimates that these policies will cost \$4,500-\$5,000 per person and \$12,000-\$12,500 per family in 2016, with the costs rising thereafter.

So, basically, you’re looking at penalties of approximately the following at the following income levels:

• Less than \$9,500 income = \$0

• \$9,500 – \$37,000 income = \$695

• \$50,000 income = \$1,000

• \$75,000 income = \$1,600

• \$100,000 income = \$2,250

• \$125,000 income = \$2,900

• \$150,000 income = \$3,500

• \$175,000 income = \$4,100

• \$200,000 income = \$4,700

• Over \$200,000 = The cost of a “bronze” health-insurance plan.

The IRS is supposed to collect the tax. But according to the Tax Policy Center, it is not clear how much the IRS will be able to collect:

Finally, there is the issue of whether the IRS can collect the tax if someone refuses to either buy insurance or pay the fine.  The ACA says the IRS should enforce the law by imposing a tax penalty—but then effectively blocks the agency from using most of the tools it normally uses to go after tax scofflaws.

The ACA bars the IRS from bringing a criminal enforcement case against someone who refuses to pay the non-insurance penalty. And it makes it very difficult, if not impossible, for it to enforce a tax lien. Law professors Jordan Barry and Bryan Camp have a nice piece in Tax Notes explaining it all.

That leaves only one tool—the IRS can subtract the penalty from any refund it owes a taxpayer. But that applies only if the IRS happens to owe somebody a refund. These days, two-thirds of taxpayers get one, but it is usually their choice.

Only low-income households who receive refundable credits, such as the Earned Income Credit, always get refunds. But the ACA specifically exempts most of them from the tax because their income is so low.

Finally, this tax isn’t the only one in the law. Here is a list of five other taxes that will hit taxpayers soon.

### Most Popular

#### End the 9/11 Syndrome at the FBI: Terrible Things Happen, and There’s Little Accountability

Howard Finkelstein, the Broward County public defender whose office is representing Nikolas Cruz, the suspect in the mass shooting in Parkland, Fla., puts it bluntly: This kid exhibited every single known red flag, from killing animals to having a cache of weapons to disruptive behavior to saying he wanted to be ...

#### Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ...

#### Russia Launches ‘Information’ War, U.S. Responds with Lawsuit and Self-Destruction

The Russians are engaged in “information warfare” against the United States. That was the big soundbite at Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s press conference Friday afternoon, announcing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s election-meddling indictment against 13 Russians and three Russian ...

#### Is There an Obstruction Case against President Trump?

It has become more urgent to ask: Why is there a special counsel in the Russia investigation? At this point, that question should be put to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — in the federal government, it’s the lawyers’ lawyer. To get down to brass tacks: May the president of the United ...

#### A Gun-Control Measure Conservatives Should Consider

To understand the American gun-control debate, you have to understand the fundamentally different starting positions of the two sides. Among conservatives, there is the broad belief that the right to own a weapon for self-defense is every bit as inherent and unalienable as the right to speak freely or practice ...

#### Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ...