The Corner

Obama to Propose Sequester Delay, More Taxes

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) was asked at a press conference today what House Republicans planned to do to avoid the spending sequester set to take effect in March.

Boehner reminded members of the press that House Republicans have, on two separate occasions, passed legislation that would replace the sequester with an alternative package of cuts less heavily weighted toward the defense budget. “It’s time for the Senate Democrats to do their work,” he said. “It’s time for the president to offer his ideas about how to replace the sequester.”

Moments later, the White House announced that President Obama will propose a short-term package of spending cuts and tax increases that would delay the sequester until the formal budget process can be completed (Obama’s budget is already past due). He is scheduled to speak at 1:15 p.m., the same time that House majority leader Eric Cantor (R., Va.) will deliver a major address at the American Enterprise Institute. A coincidence, surely.

Needless to say, the proposal is going nowhere. “Not going to happen,” says a House GOP aide. “Obama got his tax hikes. That debate is over.” The fiscal-cliff deal passed earlier this year included $600 billion in new taxes. However, the president and his Democratic allies have made clear they want even more. Republicans, meanwhile, say enough is enough.

“We believe there is a better way to reduce the deficit, but Americans do not support sacrificing real spending cuts for more tax hikes,” Boehner said in a statement. “The president’s sequester should be replaced with spending cuts and reforms that will start us on the path to balancing the budget in ten years.”

House Republicans appear increasingly willing to let the full $1 trillion sequester, half of which would come out of the defense budget, take effect. “I think it’s necessary to make those real kinds of cuts, and then hopefully we can restore military spending and offset it with other spending cuts elsewhere,” Representative Paul Broun (R., Ga.) told me in January. 

House Republicans want to see real spending cuts, and the sequester, while imperfect, would achieve a meaningful reduction in federal spending. And without raising taxes.

Andrew Stiles — Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online. He previously worked at the Washington Free Beacon, and was an intern at The Hill newspaper. Stiles is a 2009 ...

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More