The Corner

Obama Targets Defense for Cuts

Back when Washington used to worry about deficits, Bill Clinton suckered a conservative Congress into avoiding hard choices on domestic spending by gutting defense. Today, President Obama plans an instant replay. Will conservatives get suckered twice?

Clinton basically used the post–Cold War drawdown of the military to reduce federal spending. It enabled him to divert Congress from addressing the serious questions of long-term entitlement spending, tax policy, and other discretionary government spending.

But Clinton’s defense cuts went beyond what was prudent, so not only did he divert Congress from dealing with long-term spending issues, he made the country less safe. That road led to 9/11 and left the Bush administration scrambling to ramp up in order to fight the Long War.

Now, here we go again.

Obama’s idea of a workable deficit deal includes even deeper cuts in defense. The Pentagon has reportedly already been told to tee up another $100 billion in defense cuts, over the $400 billion the president has already called for.

Deep cuts in defense have undeniable political appeal. They would lessen the pressure on Congress to deal with the real cause of our deteriorating fiscal condition — politically popular entitlement programs.

But over the long term, deep defense cuts are no more sustainable than current entitlement spending. Defense “savings” have costs. Readiness will plummet. That will embolden our enemies to take advantage of our weakness, and ultimately the people and Congress will insist that we respond. So we will have to whip-saw defense spending up again. Welcome to the future, where taxes are higher, deficits are bigger, and entitlement programs are still ballooning.

That is a prospect for real disaster, and it is also unnecessary. The Heritage Foundation has offered a long-term budget blueprint called “Saving the American Dream,” which fully funds defense, does not raise taxes, balances the budget in ten years, and leaves every class of Americans better off than they are now. Why would conservatives in Congress sign up for a deficit deal that does anything less?

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More