The Corner

Obama: U.S. Should Take Military Action, Will Seek Congressional Authorization

President Barack Obama said today that he would seek congressional approval for any strike against Syria, which will delay any strike until at least mid September when Congress reconvenes.

After announcing that he believes the United States should use military action in Syria, Obama declared that he “will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people’s representatives in Congress.” He did note, “I believe I have the authority to carry out this action without specific congressional authorization,” but said he thought “our country will be stronger” and “our actions will be even more effective” with congressional approval.

The president said he had spoken Saturday morning with “all four congressional leaders,” and that they had agreed to schedule a debate and a vote as soon as Congress comes back into session.  Congress is scheduled to reconvene on September 9.

The president explained that any strike will not be an “open-ended intervention” and will be “limited in duration and scope.” He noted that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs informed him that the military’s “capacity to execute this mission is not time-sensitive,” and a strike could be carried out at any time.

President Obama said he was confident in the case the U.S. government has made and would not wait on U.N. inspectors. The United Nations Security Council, he said, has been “completely paralyzed and [is] unwilling to hold Assad accountable,” so that he feels “comfortable going forward” without U.N. authorization.

The president argued that a strike in Syria demonstrating disapproval of chemical-weapons use was key to maintaining the legitimacy of the international system, saying “this has implications beyond chemical warfare.”

“If we won’t enforce accountability in the face of this heinous act,” he asked, “what does it say about our resolve in the face of others who flout international rules — to goverments who would choose to build nuclear arms?”

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More