The Corner

Obama’s Immigration Proposal

President Obama just gave about a 25 minute speech in Las Vegas outlining (in terms even more broad than the Senate’s gang of eight yesterday) his principles for comprehensive (but of course) immigration reform. Here are the highlights from the president’s speech and the written proposal released by the White House:

  • Broad talk about boosting border security by “enhancing our infrastructure and technology” and giving law enforcement “the tools they need to make our communities safer from crime.” Includes boosted security at ports of entry and crossings, “public-private partnerships” for visitor processing (potentially intriguing), increased penalties for a variety of immigration-related crimes like passport fraud and human trafficking, an expansion of the immigration court system, and a “streamlined” process for removing immigration offenders deemed (by whom?) to be security threats.

  • E-Verify with boosted penalties for the hiring of illegals and sundry other goodies like high-tech, tamper-resistant Social Security cards. Ominously, it also includes the creation of a “labor law enforcement fund” to “help ensure that industries that employ significant numbers of immigrant workers comply with labor laws.”

  • “Earned citizneship,” and here I’ll quote at length: “Create a provisional legal status. Undocumented immigrants must come forward and register, submit biometric data, pass criminal-background and national-security checks, and pay fees and penalties before they will be eligible for a provisional legal status. Agricultural workers and those who entered the United States as children would be eligible for the same program. Individuals must wait until the existing legal immigration backlogs are cleared before getting in line to apply for lawful permanent residency (i.e., a “green card”), and ultimately United States citizenship. Consistent with current law, people with provisional legal status will not be eligible for welfare or other federal benefits, including subsidies or tax credits under the new health-care law.” After getting a green card, these provisionally legal immigrants would have to pass additional checks and hurdles before applying for citizenship. The process will be expedited for “DREAMers” who attend college or serve in the armed forces.

  • More legal immigration. First, by expanding preferences for family members of existing legal immigrants (including those in a “permanent relationship with a same-sex partner.”) Second, by expanding visas and eliminating existing per-country caps on employer-sponsored visas. Third, by automatically issuing green cards to immigrants who secure advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics at U.S. universities. (Employers of these graduates would have to pay a fee that would ostensibly go to job training for American-born nerds). Fourth, by creating new categories of visas for investors and entrepreneurs. Also includes vague plans to “encourage integration.”

Most of the details here were left unpacked in the speech. It’s worth noting that there was basically dead silence in the Vegas crowd when it came to enforcement and employment verification. It’s also worth noting that he left out some of the most controversial bits, like the small matter of the the blanket recognition of same-sex unions by the federal government. The plan is also mum on an “enforcement trigger” sought by congressional Republicans, which would tie the substantive reform to measurable border-security improvements.

Politically, this was a campaign-style speech to a very friendly crowd, complete with weird, constitutionally empty threats to the very legislators who beat the president to the punch by 24 hours (“If Congress is unable to move forward in a timely fashion, I will send up a bill. . . and insist that they vote on it right away” — presumably SEAL Team Six will be involved). Rhetorically, Obama made a few subtle but key shifts from past principles, most noticeably away from “a path to legal status” for illegals to “a path toward citizenship” — “earned citizenship,” to be precise, which appears to be the administration’s favored alternative to the loaded “amnesty.”

This is the kind of speech and the kind of proposal designed to make clear to Congress that the president is going “all rights reserved.” It leaves him free to either use the most controversial elements as bargaining chips or blow up bipartisan talks by “insisting” on planks leftward of the bipartisan consensus.

Daniel Foster — Daniel Foster has been news editor of National Review Online since 2009, and was a web site editor until 2012. His work has appeared in The American Spectator, The American ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More