The Corner

Obama’s ‘Plan’: Taxes and More Taxes

The Wall Street Journal has some scoop on what Obama plans to offer in his speech on deficit reduction later this week. He will reportedly outline changes to entitlement programs, presumably on a far smaller scale than those put forward by House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan. He’ll also put Social Security on the table, something many Democrats adamantly oppose. However, don’t expect those items to comprise the bulk of the speech. As White House adviser David Plouffe indicated Sunday on Meet the Press, the president is intent on rehashing the tax debate from last year’s lame-duck session, and then some:

In a speech Wednesday, Mr. Obama will propose cuts to entitlement programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and changes to Social Security, a discussion he has largely left to Democrats and Republicans in Congress. He also will call for tax increases for people making over $250,000 a year, a proposal contained in his 2012 budget, and changing parts of the tax code he thinks benefit the wealthy.

“Every corner of the federal government has to be looked at here,” David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said Sunday in one of multiple television appearances. “Revenues are going to have to be part of this,” he said, referring to tax increases.

Until now, Mr. Obama has been largely absent from the raging debate over the long-term deficit. The White House has done little with the recommendations of its own bipartisan deficit commission. And Mr. Obama’s 2012 budget didn’t offer many new ideas for tackling entitlement spending, among the biggest long-term drains on the federal budget.

Obama’s 2012 budget already called for eliminating the Bush-era tax rates on high earners and raising more than $1.5 trillion in new taxes. Plouffe, without a hint of irony, said the president’s plan would attempt to reduce the deficit in a way that “doesn’t compromise our ability to grow the economy and create jobs.”

Apparently, Obama didn’t even bother to tell members of his own party, potentially undercutting the work of House Democrats, who, led by Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen (D., Md.), were planning to release an alternative budget this week, as well as the members of the ’Gang of Six’ working group on deficit reduction, who were also planning to release a plan in the very near future:

The White House move caught Democrats in Congress off guard, according to aides, and details of the president’s proposals were sketchy. Mr. Plouffe said the president will name a dollar amount for deficit reduction, although the White House wouldn’t provide specifics. Introducing taxes into the discussion has the potential to complicate the resolution of coming budget fights, specifically the need to raise the debt ceiling, a move needed to prevent the U.S. defaulting on its debt.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.), ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, expressed concern Sunday that the news of the president’s forthcoming proposal was announced “not by a substantive policy official such as his budget director or Treasury Secretary but by the President’s top political adviser.”

Obama’s 2012 budget, Sessions said, was “the most irresponsible spending plan any president has ever put forward,” and suggested that if the president has finally come to terms with reality and had a change of heart on the matter of fiscal responsibility, simply reading from a teleprompter would not suffice.

“The president’s vision, whatever it is, must be presented in a detailed, concrete form,” Sessions said. “CBO must be able to score it and I and the Budget Committees in the House and Senate must be able to scrutinize it.”

“The Republican House proposed last week the most serious effort I have seen during my career to address our nation’s long-term fiscal challenges,” he continued. “I anxiously await an equally serious proposal from the Democrat Senate and White House. Another Washington-style tax-and-spend plan will not be acceptable.”

Andrew Stiles — Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online. He previously worked at the Washington Free Beacon, and was an intern at The Hill newspaper. Stiles is a 2009 ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More