The Corner

Obama’s Speech: Two Parts, Both Bad

The best feature of Obama’s Oval Office energy speech was its brevity. No doubt basketball-fan-in-chief didn’t want to preempt Game 6 of the Lakers-Celtic series. Perhaps it’s also the case that some greybeard in the White House (Axelrod? Bob Bauer?) recognized that this had become the most anticipated presidential energy speech since…Jimmy Carter in 1979. Not a good parallel. At least Obama didn’t lecture us about our “crisis of confidence” and other metaphysical failings. And he didn’t wear a windmill beanie, or whatever would be the global-warming equivalent of Carter’s infamous cardigan sweater.

 

The speech had two parts, equally problematic. While BP should certainly be held strictly liable for the costs and damages of the spill (as Richard Epstein argues in the Wall Street Journal today), this shouldn’t become an excuse for Obama to loot the company or politicize the compensation and damages process. But it’s probably just too irresistible to an administration that is hostile to private wealth.

 

The “new energy” part of the speech was more problematic. Obama practically choked on mentioning “climate,” and assiduously avoided mentioning cap-and-trade or placing an explicit price on carbon energy. Instead we got more energy happy-talk, complete with the tired trope about putting a man on the moon, which we haven’t done for a long time, without reflecting on the reason why. (Hint: It might have something to do with that favorite environmental concept: “sustainability.”)

 

Environmentalists have to be bitterly disappointed that Obama won’t be more publicly supportive of their agenda for dealing with “the greatest crisis the world has ever faced.” Maybe he’s just not sincere about this issue at all, as Eric Pooley suggests in his new book, The Climate Wars. A devastating excerpt last week on Slate.com suggests the White House doesn’t see climate change as the kind of crisis that is too good to waste. To the contrary, it’s the kind of crisis that could cost political support. And Time magazine’s Bryan Walsh, normally a water-carrier for the environmental establishment, says Obama’s speech represents a requiem for cap-and-trade.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More