The Corner

Piecemeal Amnesties in the States

While we watch the immigration show in Washington, we shouldn’t forget the states.

In Alabama, the ACLU, SPLC, and their comrades finally beat the state into submission, forcing it into a settlement that voids portions of the immigration law passed in 2011. The triumphant NYT editorial had a fitting headline: “Alabama Surrenders.” Perhaps most important for the open-borders groups, the state will pay them $350,000 in attorney’s fees and costs — great work if you can get it.

At the same time, some states are following in John Calhoun’s footsteps, passing legislation to subvert federal law. Governor Moonbeam in California has signed a bill establishing a special illegal-alien driver’s license and a measure restricting local police from handing over arrested illegal aliens to federal authorities. Eric Holder hasn’t announced whether he’s planning to sue the state. And FAIR has a new report out detailing the sanctuary policies in 103 local jurisdictions around the country designed to shield illegal aliens from law enforcement.

The open-borders lawsuits against Alabama, Arizona, and other states were based on preemption — the claim that Congress, with its plenary power over immigration, had determined what things were permissible to states, and that these states had gone beyond those limits. The courts erred in deciding where Congress had drawn the line, but the existence of such a line is indisputable. (That’s why the anti-enforcement crowd is categorically opposed to the SAFE Act, passed by the House Judiciary Committee — it would, among other things, clarify where the line is and explicitily give states more latitude.)

But if there are things states are preempted from doing in support of federal immigration law, there are also things states are barred from doing to undermine that law. Specifically, California’s Trust Act, the one prohibiting local police from cooperating with ICE in many circumstances, is clearly illegal. An administration that was committed to the constitutional requirement to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” would not only be informing California of its intent to file a lawsuit, but would also be threatening to cut off law enforcement funding and to deny the state access to the National Crime Information Center database. But I guess the president didn’t know about that part of his oath of office.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More