The Corner

The Political Battlefield of Late-Term Abortion

Nancy Pelosi may think that the abattoir of a late-term-abortion clinic is ”sacred ground,” but polls show that most Americans oppose late term abortion. Indeed, regardless of one’s views on early-term abortion, if a woman needs to end her post-viability pregnancy for a significant health reason, I cannot understand why everyone doesn’t see that the proper approach — absent significant medical reasons — is to deliver the baby and care for the child.

But a significant number of pro -abortion advocates stand with Pelosi. As I point out in my current First Things column, a strong vein in their constitutional thinking now claims that any regulation of abortion denies women “equal citizen status,” in the words of Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. If equal protection becomes the constitutional basis of the abortion license — as opposed to privacy or due process — it could mean that the abortion license will become absolute, allowing termination at any time, for any purpose. After all, that was the point of the Roe v. Wade/Doe v. Bolton joint rulings. It just didn’t turn out that way.

Meanwhile, the struggle to ban most late-term abortions has picked up steam in the Congress, where the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would ban post-20-week abortions except to protect the physical health or life of the mother, or in cases of rape or incest. The idea is that since science shows fetuses may feel pain at that point in the pregnancy, it would be cruel to permit them to be torn apart. Of course, the answer of the abortion-at-any-time crowd is to just anesthetize the fetuses before the abortion proceeds.

Expect the bill to be fought tooth and tong by the radical reproductive-rights crowd. They believe in an abortion right to the moment of birth — perhaps even “after-birth” abortion — and evidence of fetal pain, even if it became uncontroversial, isn’t going to talk them out of it.

Wesley J. Smith — Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More