President Obama Uses Tax Deal to Set Up 2012

Good policy is good politics: In the end, that is the lesson of yesterday’s “deal” between President and Obama and Republican congressional leaders. Getting a deal to avoid raising taxes was an economic imperative. With the clock ticking before IRS officials would have had to impose instructions for higher withholding and thus the imposition of a de facto tax increase on January 1, time was of the essence. Since nothing would ensure a one-term presidency faster than a continuing economic malaise — or even a double-dip recession — the politics aligned with doing the right thing for the economy. Keeping taxes low increases the odds of a quicker, self-sustaining recovery; the president and his advisers realized this, and the urgency to reach a deal became paramount.

Moreover, the deal contained a surprising tax-policy victory: throwing overboard the deadweight of the Make Work Pay tax credit in favor of a marginal rate reduction for workers in the form of a one-year payroll-tax reduction. While the time for Keynesian stimulus has long passed — and thus the merits of the macroeconomic impacts of UI extensions and temporary business expensing are dubious — there are benefits to improved labor incentives. So, from a policy perspective, some aspects of the plan look better than one could have anticipated. Indeed, the major defect in the plan is the absence of spending cuts to offset the increases in outlays. True to history, the president thus far pays only lip service to the problems of mortgaging our future.

Will the deal pass Congress? Democrats were noticeably quiet on Capitol Hill after the president’s remarks, which were remarkably partisan in nature, devoid of the usual pleasantries and congratulations to Republicans for coming to an agreement. The tone appeared to be a token contribution to the wishes of the liberal base, and may aid the president in collecting votes. But more than anything, the president’s remarks marked the beginning of the 2012 presidential race. By agreeing to a two-year extension, the president teed up tax policy as a centerpiece of that race, evidently believing that a candidacy based on class warfare will be successful. Unfortunately, that is not good policy and will not turn out to be good politics.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin is president of the American Action Forum.

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More