The President’s Big Boost to Corporate Welfare

Contrary to what the New York Times was reporting on Friday, President Obama’s plan to consolidate six agencies into one isn’t “an aggressive campaign to shrink the size of the federal government.” After all, we are talking about $300 million over ten years, which is 0.0081 percent of the government’s 2012 budget of $3,700,000,000,000.

In fact, I did wonder on Friday how the president could get so much news coverage considering how ridiculously small the announced savings were. Identically, I am not sure how much credit one should get for proposing to get rid of duplicative programs. It seems like the least a president should do. On the other hand, the fact that it never ends up happening is a pretty sad statement of what Washington is all about.

My first thoughts after hearing the news was that it was a step in the right direction. But when I looked at the president’s list of agencies, I realized that this plan is even more ridiculous than the amount of money it pretends to save. In the aftermath of the Solyndra scandal and the attention that it brought to crony capitalism, the president’s plan seems like an attempt to give a new lease on life to corporate welfare. Think about it: the thing these agencies have in common is that their main goal is to deliver taxpayer dollars to the private sector. It means that the proper policy then would be to abolish these agencies and programs, rather than merge them.

The Small Business Administration, one of the agencies in the plan, is a good example of that. First, the agency guarantees loans to undeserving small businesses (one criterion for getting an SBA loan is that the business can’t get credit elsewhere). Unsurprisingly, these businesses end up defaulting at a higher rate than small businesses that do not rely on the guarantee to access capital. Second, the SBA’s loan program is little more than a corporate-welfare program for the big banks issuing the loans.

In the end, my colleague Matt Mitchell may have it right when he notes that this consolidation could make the job of lobbyists even easier. Whatever your private interest, in order to get government money, you would only have to make one stop instead of six.

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More