The Corner

The President’s Outrageous ‘Accommodation’ Changes Nothing

The fact that the insurance companies will be required to provide contraception “free of charge” apparently means that they will be required to shift the cost of contraception from the religious organizations to their non-religious organizations. But at the end of today’s fact sheet, the White House notes that in some cases covering contraception can reduce premiums. That means that if the insurance companies actually cost-shift the coverage of contraception to non-religious organizations, it might lower the insurance premiums of non-religious organizations and raise premiums for religious ones. Either way, this just piles a mess on top of a mess. Otherwise, as Yuval points out, today’s announcement changes nothing. 

Religious organizations should not back down an inch. With the tax penalty on individual health insurance, the federal government forced employers to become part of the national infrastructure of health care. Their freedom of choice is illusory because their participation is coerced, through a tax penalty on individual purchase of insurance, which is economically equivalent to a tax penalty on them. On top of that tax penalty, Obamacare imposes an employer mandate, with a more explicit tax penalty. Now, having forced employers, including religious organizations, to purchase health insurance, the federal government is going to require them to provide a service that they think is murder.

It doesn’t matter what gimmick the president comes up with to hide the fact. Religious organizations are penalized if they don’t provide health insurance, and their health insurance must cover contraceptives and  abortifacients. Today’s announcement is an “accommodation” only in the minds of those who share the president’s infantilized understanding of economics.  

If the Supreme Court were still enforcing the inherent limitation in Congress’s power to regulate commerce “among the several States” under the Constitution, we wouldn’t even have this problem because the federal government wouldn’t be able to regulate health care at all. But since the New Deal, the Court has abandoned its role as guardian of the Constitution’s limits on federal power. In that sense, our country is in a post-constitutional era, slouching towards a tyranny-of-the-majority. As Walter Lippmann predicted would happen if the New Deal was allowed to stand, “constitutional checks and bills of rights exist only by consent of the majority.”

What Obama is doing with the contraception mandate should shock the conscience of everyone who believes in the protections that our Constitution is supposed to provide. Obama took an oath to uphold the Constitution. That makes his lack of interest in what the Constitution says even more inexcusable than his economic illiteracy. All Americans should be outraged by this casually tyrannical assault on our basic rights.  

— Mario Loyola is director of the Center for Tenth Amendment Studies at the Texas Public Policy Foundation.  

Mario Loyola — Contributing editor Mario Loyola is senior fellow and Director of the Center for Competitive Federalism at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty. He began his career in corporate ...

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Science & Tech

Set NASA Free

The Trump administration has proposed shifting the International Space Station from a NASA-exclusive research facility to a semi-public, semi-private one. Its plan would nix all government funding for the ISS by 2025 and award at least $150 million per year to NASA to help with the transition. This would be a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More