The Corner

‘Pro-Choicers’ Are Backing Off of the Label. Why?

Pro-abortion advocates are “shunning” the “pro-choice” label according to the New York Times.

Reporter Jackie Calmes’s piece, published on Tuesday, explains that the movement is shifting away from abortion policy, fought for with euphemisms like “choice,” to broader economic issues. It is a must read — but it’s what is not said that’s the real story.

For decades, the pro-abortion feminist movement has had a pure message: Abortion is a fundamental human right. Women can achieve neither liberation nor success nor happiness without unfettered abortion access. That message came to women at the most vulnerable times in their lives and, tragically, many bought the lie. Writing her concurrence in the 1989 Webster decision, Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor argued that, in fact, millions of women had “ordered their lives” around the availability of abortion. She was exactly right. Women did come to order their lives around it – only to find out it is not the fundamental liberating human right that was promised.

After decades of laser-like focus on this one, ultimate issue, abortion advocates suddenly say there is more to the story. Abortion is “complicated.” Young women don’t like to label themselves. There is room for other viewpoints. The economy! Don’t forget about the economy.

It is dishonest, cynical spin.

While the leaders of America’s No. 1 abortion business, Planned Parenthood, as well as NARAL, NOW, and EMILY’s List, now attempt to ignore what their movement was built upon, the women who bought the lie they made so appealing are left to suffer alone, and suffer the loss of their children. This “pro-whatever” movement does nothing for the women whose lives they helped destroy by selling the “quick and easy” fix.

For more than twenty years, for instance, Dr. Teresa Burke, the founder of Rachel’s Vineyard, has helped women to heal from their abortion. Many of these women experience what they call post-traumatic stress disorder while the pro-abortion movement denies their grief. It’s no big deal, they say.

In the last 41 years, the lie of Roe has become less and less popular, because people found it to be less and less true. There is a reason why there’s an “intensity gap” among young people on this issue. America’s youth have seen the ultrasound screen, they’ve seen their premature brothers and sisters nursed to health in the NICU. They have also seen the intense pain of their mothers, aunts, sisters, and friends after abortion. 

Instead of admitting the truth about the unborn child and the damage abortion inflicts on women, the pro-choice movement now pretends they’re about something totally different – several somethings different, in fact. This is a far cry from the “sacred ground” Nancy Pelosi stood on only last year. That ground is crumbling. 

You know you’re losing when you try to change the subject.

When asked about their failure to support a commonsense, compassionate limit on abortion after five months, vulnerable incumbent Senate Democrats are continuing this theme across the country. Kay Hagan and Mary Landrieu change the subject, Mark Pryor quite literally ran away to avoid answering.  

This is a defensive posture. Pro-whatever crowd, what are you for?

— Marjorie Dannenfelser is the president of the Susan B. Anthony List, a nationwide network of more than 365,000 Americans dedicated to electing candidate and pursuing policies to reduce and ultimately end abortion. 

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More