Politics & Policy

The Corner

Progressive Illiberalism Had a Profound Effect on Trump Voters

In response to Eastland On Raich

In the battle over whether Donald Trump is something new and entirely different in American politics, a unique illiberal threat, consider me on Team Cooke. I agree with Charlie. He’s in large part a product of and reaction to pre-existing illiberal trends in American life. He didn’t spring up out of nowhere. In fact many millions of Americans of specifically chose him to the instrument of progressive destruction, the illiberal man who would meet force with force (unlike all those “GOPe pansies” who don’t realize you have to “punch back twice as hard.”) In other words, an awful lot of American voters surveyed the cultural and political landscape — including a wave of progressive illiberalism — from the Obama administration to campuses to corporations, and said, “You want war? Then war you shall have.”

But it’s becoming increasingly clear to me that you can list and document illiberal progressive acts all day long, and some smart folks still see Trump as entirely different. His illiberalism isn’t just different in degree, but in kind. In the words of Tom Nichols, for example, there’s no line from campus intolerance to the Trump crowds chanting “lock her up.” In his view, threats to jail Hillary are “banana republic stuff.” 

We can’t forget that Trump’s crowds (and Trump) didn’t speak about jailing Hillary in a vacuum. She as under active FBI investigation, and her treatment of classified information was so reckless and careless that I’ve never in my career heard of a member of the military getting away with similar conduct. Trump shouldn’t have indicated that he’d prosecute her (presidents don’t and shouldn’t make prosecution decisions), but the made-up legal standards applied to protect Hillary from prosecution were themselves signs of the corruption of the rule of law.

Even more importantly, we can’t forget the Obama administration’s IRS/DOJ tea party targeting scandal — where the IRS systematically singled out conservative voices, conducted intrusive investigations, leaked confidential documents, and even discussed colluding with the DOJ to “piece together” prosecutions of conservative groups. The administration turned one of the federal government’s most powerful domestic agencies against ordinary citizens. 

Nor should we forget the Wisconsin “John Doe” investigations, where armed agents launched pre-dawn raids on Wisconsin conservatives, then subjected them to extraordinary gag orders, for the sake of “investigating” their constitutionally-protected issue advocacy. Can you imagine if, say, Republican prosecutors launched raids on Democratic activists — all while communicating with a Trump-led IRS? The cries of oppression in “Trump’s America” would reach the heavens. Yet that’s what happened in Obama’s America. Banana Republic indeed. 

Finally, if anyone wonders why white evangelicals gave more than 80 percent of their vote to Trump, they should walk a mile in their shoes — when they’re confronting colleges that have systematically attempted to force Christian groups off campus, systematically discriminated against Christian scholars, and then seem eager to spend Christian families’ life savings to teach their children that the faith of their fathers is mindless and bigoted. They should ponder what a conservative Christian thinks about an administration so hell-bent on implementing its social agenda that it will not only try to force nuns to facilitate access to abortifacients, it will even try to inject the federal government into the pastor-selection process. These actions, taken together, had a profound impact on conservatives — filling some with fury and frightening others into believing their fundamental freedoms would be extinguished if Hillary won.

It’s not enough to simply say that arguments about these (and other) examples of progressive illiberalism represent nothing more than “what-about-ism.” Why aren’t they examples of the exact kinds of illiberalism that people fear from Trump? Why are they insignificant by contrast with Trump’s threats? Make the argument. Don’t just assert the difference.

The tragedy of Trump is that his voters ultimately chose to fight illiberalism with their own strongman. I wish they’d chosen to fight illiberalism with constitutionalism, but a constitutional restoration will have to wait until another day (if ever). In the meantime, however, we can’t pretend that Trump’s supporters weren’t reacting to illiberalism that was very real,  very serious, and profoundly affected many American lives. 

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More