The Corner

Promote Abortion or Be Gone

“It’s a new day,” a despondent freshman congressman, Rep. James Lankford (R., Okla.), announced to me late Thursday. “If we’re writing grant proposals to specifically exclude Catholic charities, it’s a new day.”

His was the logical takeaway from Thursday’s hearing before the full House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which he sits on.

Lankford has a bill that would reform the grant process to make sure this kind of “earmark-like preference,” as committee chairman Darrell Issa put it today, would have to be voted on — out in the open. In this case, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops had been administering a contract with HHS on human trafficking for five years. This year, though, they were dropped, because of an HHS insistence that all contractors be willing to promote the whole panoply of legal “reproductive health options.” In other words, they instituted “pro-abortion favoritism,” as New Jersey congressman Chris Smith put it.

But Lankford’s point about this being a milestone is an important one. We know this is an administration that favors legal abortion. We also know that there are Democrats who consider it an unjust surrender any time there is a single prohibition put on taxpayer funding of abortion (like the Hyde amendment, which covers Labor and HHS appropriations). But it is apparently current HHS policy that your work is ineligible for government funding if you are not willing to encourage abortion. This was a coalition program administered by the USCCB, which did not itself provide services. But the HHS will now only contract with organizations that will, for instance, send a pregnant sex-trafficking victim for abortion. (A little added victimization?)

And that does seem to be the case. Although the secretary of Health and Human Services has yet to address the issue, and the department has so far released only documents irrelevant to the question in hand, it remains the only explanation for why a program that was successful and recommended by HHS staff was broken off.

Lankford insists that it is an applicant’s right to know why he was rejected. It appears the reason is quite the outrage.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More