Politics & Policy

The Corner

A Question Needing an Answer

In Impromptus today, I have the usual mélange, ranging over issues domestic and foreign, and large and small. The first issue is big: health care. And I have a memory of the 2016 campaign — the Republican primaries.

Donald Trump said, “I have a heart.” About Ted Cruz, he said, “Maybe he’s got no heart.”

Last month, President Trump celebrated the House’s health-care bill. Then he called it “mean.” And he said that any worthy health-care legislation had to have “more heart.”

What does that mean, in specific terms? This is something that everyone in politics has to wrestle with. What does it mean to have “heart,” or to lack it? For decades, Democrats have criticized Republicans as “heartless.” When a Republican president uses essentially the same rhetoric — where does that leave the parties?

The big question, I think, is whether the federal government should be responsible for the health care of all. Once you say yes to that question, everything changes. Then you are basically haggling over price (to echo an old joke).

During those 2016 primaries, Carly Fiorina spoke of the free market, boldly (and refreshingly, to my ears). She spoke about it in connection with health care. The free market, she said, is “the one thing we haven’t tried.”

“We are all socialists now,” someone said, eons ago. (Not Carly.) Are we? Should we be honest about it? Do the health-care systems of Canada and other such countries have more “heart” than ours? Do they serve their people better?

In my column today, I mention the governor of Newfoundland (called the “premier”), who, in 2010, went to Florida to have surgery — heart surgery. Taking grief from his countrymen about it, he said, “This is my heart, it’s my health, it’s my choice.”

In the future, will Canadian politicians be able to come to America, when the need arises? Will America still be a kind of escape hatch? Exceptional, if you will?

I’ve been doing a fair amount of quoting, and will now quote an old adage: “In for a penny, in for a pound.” If government is to be responsible for health care — might as well do it right, whatever “right” is.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More