The Corner

re: Burke & Disraeli & Conservatism

May I just add a footnote to Yuval Levin’s very acute analysis of the Sam Tanenhaus article on the death of conservatism?

One of the problems of relying on Burke and Disraeli as guides to a genuine conservatism is that, as active politicians, writers, and speakers over several decades, they both said a great many things that, torn from context, can be made to contradict each other. And if it is not hard to make each of them contradict himself, it is child’s play to make them contradict each other.

As it happens, though, there are one or two quotations from both men that clearly represent their mature thought in simple form but in all its complexity. Let me suggest that this passage from Burke’s 1791 “Letter to a Member of the National Assembly” is such a passage:

Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites,—in proportion as their love to justice is above their rapacity,—in proportion as their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumption,—in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.

A similar quotation from Disraeli’s 1867 speech on reform is this passage of the relationship between conservatism and change: “In a progressive country change is constant; and the great question is not whether you should resist change which is inevitable, but whether that change should be carried out in deference to the manners, the customs, the laws and the traditions of a people, or whether it should be carried out in deference to abstract principles, and arbitrary and general doctrines.”

In the context of current pollitics the Burke quotation supports Yuval’s contention that government should “should avoid undermining the foundations of future progress, which [are] political order, family stability, and social peace.” It is, in effect, an endorsement of conservative resistance in the ongoing culture wars. Disraeli’s remarks, again applied to current controversies, suggest that Americans should look to their own constitutional traditions in solving their problems. It is in effect an endorsement of conservative resistance to the thoughtless drift towards transnational governance and the erosion of democratic sovereignty. Sorry, a longer footnote than I expected.


Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More