The Corner

Re: Chris Cuomo Doesn’t Get How Religious Freedom Works

Andrew posted yesterday on Chris Cuomo of CNN’s tortured understanding of religious liberty. Cuomo also doesn’t get how analogies work.

Here’s the relevant exchange that Cuomo had with attorney Kellie Fiedorek, who was defending the right of a photographer to decline a gig at a same-sex wedding:

Fiedorek: There’s a big distinction in America that government should not force us to ever use our business, use our talents to go against what we fundamentally believe. . . . We would not force a Muslim to participate in a Koran-burning ceremony. We wouldn’t ask a black photographer and force them to go take a picture of a KKK event . . .

Cuomo: Counselor, tell me that you’re not analogizing burning a Koran or the KKK with gay marriage. Do you really see those things as the same thing?

No, Chris, she doesn’t. The whole point of an analogy is to compare situations that are not the same but where an underlying principle — in this case, free association — might equally apply. In fact, some of the best analogies are those that compare very different things, so that we can sharpen distinctions or correct our inconsistencies.

Irrational responses to analogies are everywhere in politics, of course — when people are asked to explain why a general principle should apply to X but not to Y, their reaction is often to express shock and disdain that anyone would even mention X and Y in the same sentence. It’s a way to avoid thinking and analysis.

Maybe this was just a heat-of-the-moment slip-up by a news anchor intent on asking tough questions. But when such an anti-intellectual response has become commonplace, it suggests a deeper problem: Many journalists are simply uninterested in being consistent about general principles (such as religious liberty and free association). To them, same-sex marriage = good, and people who oppose same-sex marriage = bad. That’s as deep as their thinking appears to go.

Jason Richwine — Jason Richwine is a public-policy analyst and a contributor to National Review Online.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More