The Corner

Re: Gaza

Andrew, I think U.S. and Israeli interests are perfectly aligned on this one.  Remember bin Laden’s refrain about “the strong horse and the weak horse” – the fact that people (particularly those targeted for jihadi recruitment) are always drawn to the strong one.  That’s the language jihadis understand, and no other.

One can always say a robust response to radical Islam’s atrocities helps Hamas, al Qaeda, etc., to recruit.  But recruiting is aided at least as much by successful terrorist attacks to which the response is too meek.  The people sitting on the fence — the ones who are sympathetic to jihadi aims but ambivalent about jihadi methods — are attracted most of all by the prospect of being with a winner.  Sure, a robust response that communicates the resolve to keep fighting until the jihadists are crushed may bring in a lot of new recruits; but it also scares off a lot of prospective recruits while killing off the experienced ranks of a terrorist organization — making the organization, on the whole, a less dangerous killing machine.  That’s why it remains the right thing to do.

Some conflicts are deep ones, pitting survival against an incorrigible evil.  Those conflicts cannot be resolved until one side wins and one side loses.  The U.S. strategic interests in the Middle East will suffer as long as there is doubt about whether Israel is here to stay.  That means fighting hard until the will of those who are beyond accepting Israel’s existence is broken and their capacity to project meaningful power is destroyed. 

If we get to the point where those who are left accept Israel’s existence, however reluctantly, and are willing to negotiate their grievances through ordinary politics and diplomacy, then we can worry about a broader range of strategic interests where the U.S. and Israel may not align.  But not until then.  Until then, it’s in our interest for Israel to crush its mortal enemies … and not give those mortal enemies yet another breather so they can regroup for yet another round in a year or two.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More