The Corner

Re: A Response to Ramesh

The von Spakovsky and Slattery post is mis-titled, since it does not respond to anything I actually wrote. Start with paragraph 2:

Under Ramesh’s view of deference, if Congress made a legislative finding that the financial condition of the federal government (with its enormous deficit and debt) made it vital for the government to no longer provide “just compensation” when it seized private property, then the Court should defer to that finding and allow such a violation of the Fifth Amendment.

So in the authors’ imagination, the Court is doing the exact same thing when it ignores a specific constitutional command and when it refuses to read the word “appropriate” as free rein to write its own legislation. I’d rather not have such a foolish view attributed to me, thanks.

City of Boerne v. Flores does back up the authors: But so much the worse for Court in that terrible decision. What the Court meant by ”vital principles necessary to maintain separation of powers and the federal balance” was, simply, judicial supremacy.

As they reach their conclusion the authors cannot resist another rhetorical flourish:

Now is not the time for more deference. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 78 that the Court is “the bulwark of a limited constitution against legislative encroachments.” Ramesh would have the Court abandon that role.

Anyone urging judicial intervention could deploy that quote in precisely the same manner that von Spakovsky and Slattery do here, which is to say with no attention to the constitutional text or original understanding. An argument for deference in the kind of cases I wrote about — cases in which the Court is being asked to seize on ambiguous language to play a legislative role — is of course not an argument for judicial inaction in all cases.

And we could turn this kind of rhetoric against von Spakovsky and Slattery easily and accuse them of being judicial supremacists. The difference between their accusation and that one would be only that their rhetorical carelessness actually provides some justification for the latter.

Update: See also this post by Matt Franck for more context on that Hamilton quote.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More