The Corner

From Red States to Blue States: What’s After Wisconsin

After a three-week standoff, Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled state senate plunged ahead with a major reform of Wisconsin’s public-sector labor laws. The bill has now also been passed by the state assembly and is expected to be signed into law by Gov. Scott Walker.

In response to the Republicans’ move, the opposition — government-workers unions and Democrats — claims the battle has just begun. Some of the unions are threatening a court challenge over irregularities in the way the senate bill was passed. They have also promised to initiate recall proceedings against some Republican state senators and against Governor Walker next year (when he will be eligible). They claim, with some evidence, that public opinion is on their side. Governor Walker has lost political capital — partly because he too often got caught in the thicket of budget details and did not do a great job making his case for reform. And the unions have had the magic words “workers” and “rights” on their side.

However, the heat generated by this episode may soon cool. It probably won’t prove to be the catalyst for reviving the private-sector labor movement. In terms of the recall petitions, public opinion is not evenly distributed and most Republican state senators were elected from safe seats. For Governor Walker, a year in American politics is a long time. If layoffs of government employees are averted, public ire may subside. Furthermore, the consequences of narrowing collective-bargaining rights, reducing union membership, and lessening the amount of money available for union political activity will not have immediate effects visible to most voters.

Scott Walker in Wisconsin is providing model for “Red State” reform of state–union relations. National attention will soon shift to the big blue states — California and New York — where battles between government-workers unions and Democratic governors and legislatures are brewing. These states are unlikely to directly confront the unions’ power, because so many Democratic incumbents’ electoral fortunes hinge on it. More likely, they will pursue a “Blue State” model of reform, which works within current collective-bargaining arrangements to beg the unions for reductions in pension and health benefits. The problem with that model, however, is that it leaves intact the dysfunctional aspects of unionized government.

Daniel DiSalvo is an assistant professor of political science at the City College of New York.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More