The Corner

Revisiting ‘Land for Peace’

As Israel struggles to deal with the implications last week’s embassy attack and last month’s terror attack from Egyptian soil, it’s worth revisiting the concept of “land for peace,” a concept that has dominated Middle East negotiations ever since the Six Day War in 1967. Until now, the 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty was — by the very low standards of the Middle East — a smashing success. Whereas Egypt and Israel had fought pitched battles in 1948, 1956, 1967, during the War of Attrition (1967-1970), and in 1973, the two countries had been at peace for more than thirty years. They normalized diplomatic relations, Israel gave back the Sinai (an immense buffer zone against invasion), and America bribed Egypt to keep the peace to the tune of tens of billions of dollars of military and economic aid. But if the agreement cannot survive the Mubarak regime, will Israel have been wise to give up the Sinai?

The Arab Spring has taught us (as if we needed reminding) that the Middle East is volatile, governments come and go, and world history is littered with the burning scraps of broken peace treaties. As a result, the proper formulation is not “land for peace” but more accurately “land for truce” or “land for potential peace.” In return for something temporary and easily-revoked (such as recognition, diplomatic relations, or demilitarization), Israel is asked to decrease its strategic depth and increase its vulnerability.

The bottom line? When the world community asks Israelis and Arabs to “take a chance for peace,” Israel is the only party actually taking that “chance.”

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More