The Corner

The Right’s Ominous Beatification of Edward Snowden

Representative Justin Amash’s assertion yesterday that Edward Snowden is a whistleblower because “he told us what we needed to know” deserves more scrutiny than it’s gotten, because the implications are quite ominous.  

Society has a compelling interest in protecting whistleblowers because we don’t want wrongdoers to escape justice by covering up their unlawful activities. The difference between a whistleblower and a leaker of classified information (or any other proprietary information) is that a whistleblower gets legal protection because what he is bringing to light is even more unlawful than his disclosure of it. 

Here, nothing unlawful has occurred. A lawsuit charging that the NSA’s phone-records collection violates the Fourth Amendment doesn’t have a prayer. (Professor Richard Epstein and I wrote about the underlying issues over at The Weekly Standard). The most Amash can say is that he was in the dark about the true scope of the NSA surveillance – not because anyone was covering up any wrongdoing – but because he hasn’t been around in Congress long enough to know, didn’t avail himself of many opportunities to learn more, and doesn’t trust his fellow members on the Intelligence Committee who have been regularly briefed on all this for years.

So what Representative Amash is basically saying is that whistleblower protection should be extended to leakers of classified information if they help him overcome his youth and inexperience, or otherwise help him get around the laws that give intelligence committees in Congress regular classified briefings. 

The worst aspect of the libertarian reaction to the Snowden leak is that members of Congress are legitimizing the revelation of national-security secrets merely because they disagree with the law and how it’s been interpreted. Not only does that extend “whistleblower” protection to people who have revealed no wrongdoing, and are doing nothing other than breaking the law and putting Americans at risk, but it constitutes a degradation in the rule of law itself. The necessary implication is that our system of laws can’t be trusted and our rights must be safeguarded by extra-legal means. 

And what a very dangerous idea that is.

Mario Loyola — Contributing editor Mario Loyola is senior fellow and Director of the Center for Competitive Federalism at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty. He began his career in corporate ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More