The Corner

Roger’s Version

Roger Pilon’s latest Cato post starts with a cliché and then builds to a strawman. The cliché is that when someone whom you have criticized responds to you, it is proof that you have “hit a nerve.” The strawman is that I supposedly deny that “we’ve been far better served by having than by not having an independent judiciary, as a look around the world will attest.”

But I should not leave the impression that there is nothing more to his post than that. He also offers an odd historical interpretation.

In truth, [Marbury] was a bold assertion by the Court, grounded in the text of the Constitution, of having the power to declare its own power limited by the Constitution, thereby implying that the political branches were similarly limited. And that is the principle that explains why we enjoyed such freedom as we did during our first seven decades. It was not from “judicial restraint” – from judicial deference to the political branches, as Ponnuru would have it – but from respect for constitutional limits on the power of each of the branches, as secured by the Court (emphasis in original).

I’ll leave aside the misdescription of my views. Pilon’s claim is that the Court’s articulation of the binding nature of constitutional limits in Marbury is what made the country free (to the extent it was) in our first seven decades under the Constitution. That absurd statement is a fine, if hyperbolic, expression of the ahistorical view I was criticizing.

Update: In a mercifully brief follow-up, Pilon asks me to expand on my remark that one of the costs of the mistaken view of Supreme Court history that he perpetuates is that it biases people’s reactions to proposals to reduce judicial power. I have in mind the sort of thing discussed here.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More