The Corner

‘The Same Priority as Citizens’?

One item in Romney’s immigration platform that I hadn’t seen before was this: “Mitt Romney will work with Congress to give legal permanent residents the same priority as citizens when applying to bring husbands, wives, and minor children to the United States.” That means they would be admitted without numerical limit. This category (the Family 2A preference, for those of you keeping track) is for the spouses (and their minor children from earlier relationships) of green-card holders. If you get a green card for some reason, and you have a spouse and minor children, they all get green cards too. But if you were single when you immigrated, and later got married before becoming a citizen, this is the category you would use. People getting their green cards today in this category applied about two and a half years ago.

Making this category unlimited would be a terrible idea. First, it would further increase immigration by several hundred thousand people a year — there are currently about 300,000 people in the queue for this category. But equally important, it dilutes the meaning of citizenship. The message underlying our current arrangement is that an American citizen is delegated the right by his fellow countrymen to decide, on his own, through marriage, who gets to come to the United States without being limited by numerical caps. Permanent residents who are not yet citizens, on the other hand, are subject to the quota system precisely because they are not one of us yet. Admitting without limit the subsequently acquired spouses and children of green-card holders blurs that distinction. A permanent resident can acquire the right to admit a spouse regardless of numerical limits simply by becoming a citizen — something that is probably too easy already.

The only circumstance in which I could see this change being possibly helpful would be if it were offset by elimination of the other family-based categories, for siblings and adult sons and daughters, plus the visa lottery, because those other categories drive further chain migration in a way that spousal immigration does not.

The broader point is that Romney is betting that “less illegal/more legal” is the way to go on immigration. I disagree on policy grounds, but it might well be an attractive message politically. However, if Romney were to win and actually put forward such a package, it would be an interesting political experiment: I suspect it wouldn’t be as popular as the pollsters tell him, because the concerns people have with illegal immigration — jobs, welfare, sovereignty, language, security — are the same for excessive legal immigration.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More