Politics & Policy

The Corner

The Byrd Bloodbath

The rules surrounding the “reconciliation” process have proven a key obstacle to Republicans’ effort to repeal and replace Obamacare. Bills advanced under reconciliation can’t be filibustered — which is key when there are only 52 Senate Republicans — but under the “Byrd rule,” all provisions in them must directly relate to the budget. The Senate parliamentarian gets to decide what’s kosher and what’s not, and Republicans hoped she’d have a broad interpretation of the rules.

That hope has been dashed. News just broke that state waivers from Obamacare regulations — which Republicans had hoped to include even in the “skinny” version of repeal — do not pass muster. And this is just the latest provision to end up floating face-down in the “Byrd bath”; the other carcasses include provisions instating a six-month waiting period for people who fail to maintain continuous coverage, letting insurers charge older enrollees more relative to the young than is currently allowed, eliminating tax credits for plans that cover abortion, and defunding Planned Parenthood (which Republicans might try to bring back anyway).

These rulings don’t just take measures that Republicans want off the table; they also make it harder to make good policy. If Republicans get rid of the individual mandate, for instance, they will need to do something else to stop people from staying uninsured until they get sick and then signing up to stick everyone else with the bill — but a waiting period to sign up is now off the table. As James Capretta mentioned yesterday, the only option might be some kind of penalty that’s cycled through the federal budget, but that sounds a little bit like the mandate they’re trying to get rid of.

At this point the chances are rather large that the Republicans either will fail, or will pass something that’s incredibly risky on a policy level. (Many think the CBO overestimates when it says killing the mandate would increase the number of uninsured by 15 million, for example, but I don’t think anyone denies it would destabilize the market to some degree.) Or that they’ll start looking at more desperate options, such as overruling the parliamentarian or eliminating the filibuster for legislation. Whatever happens, we’re all in for a ride.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More