The Corner

Should ‘Government Motors’ Be Making Campaign Contributions?

General Motors has given more than $90,000 to political campaigns this year, according to data released by the Federal Election Commission last week. These are the company’s first political contributions since the 2008 election and, unsurprisingly, most of these contributions were to Midwestern congressmen and senators from states in which GM has a large presence. The contributions were evenly divided between the two parties, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which provides the details.

But GM declared bankruptcy less than a year and a half ago, and was bailed out by $65 billion in taxpayer dollars; the U.S. Treasury currently owns 61 percent of the company. Should GM be making campaign contributions, given taxpayers’ sizable involvement as shareholders?

Robert Reich, secretary of labor under President Clinton, says no. In a blog post for the Christian Science Monitor last weekend, Reich illustrates how questionable GM’s political contributions are:

Last time I looked, you and I and every other U.S. taxpayers owned a majority of GM… [W]e taxpayers are paying some people (GM executives) to tell us how we should vote for another group of people (House and Senate candidates) who will decide how our taxes will be used in the future.

His description shows how far removed Americans really are from the GM-government relationship; despite owning a majority share in GM, taxpayers are little more than spectators to GM’s funding of politicians who would craft policy favorable to the automaker. As Reich points out, the law does not “allow taxpayer-supported entities to use taxpayer dollars to influence elections. And yet this is exactly what GM is doing.”

Reich is absolutely right about campaign contributions from GM. Because the government bailout of GM made taxpayers the majority shareholder in the automaker, the company should have refrained from making campaign contributions this cycle. Openly disregarding campaign-finance laws and common sense is no way to win back the hearts of American consumers, many of whom were opposed to the GM bailout in the first place.

— Jennifer Marsico is a Jacobs Associate at the American Enterprise Institute.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More